What is it?
A Windows tablet computer from Microsoft's Surface series.
The tablet market isn't currently blessed with a plethora of options for Windows users but the devices that are available all bring stylish and innovative designs.
Microsoft's latest Surface Pro is no exception as it pushes the boundaries of how slim these machines can get while staying functional.
Good Points?
At 7.3mm (0.29in) the Surface Pro X has been specifically designed to be as thin and portable as possible.
The whole unit weighs comfortably less than a kilogram but still sports a 13-inch PixelSense touchscreen display that automatically adjusts to lighting conditions.
Windows 10 Home runs smoothly on either the 8GB or 16GB RAM variants and provides a wealth of security settings without harming the user experience.
Bad points?
Cost per component is high in this device as you are paying for the small form factor. A lack of 3.5mm headphone jack is disappointing.
Software compatibility could be an issue with older applications as Microsoft has moved to a custom processor. This requires most programs to be converted to work with their hardware.
Battery life is fair but down on previous Surface models which is another sacrifice for the thinner chassis.
Best for ...
Those always on the move and who require the lightest, thinnest Windows computer available. An optional SIM card slot aids portability negating reliance on additional devices to tether to when off WiFi.
Avoid if ...
You are looking for an all-round experience and priority on value for money. Older Surface models, although bulkier, provide the same functionality at a lower price.
Score: 7/10.
Microsoft Surface Pro X, £999 (microsoft.com)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here