The Ivy On The Square
6 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh
0131 526 4777
Lunch/Dinner: £16.50-£50
Food rating: 4/10
THE fern that sits in the lobby of The Ivy On The Square in Edinburgh is artificial, emblematic of the whole restaurant. It’s a financier’s maladroit attempt to clone the original, venerable Ivy, that vintage haunt of celebs in London’s theatre land. So far Edinburgh is the 10th location for this brand roll-out; another six are "coming soon nationwide". Milking the kudos of the one-and-only authentic Soho establishment, four "Ivy Cafes" (and another in the pipeline), complete the current "Ivy collection".
Judging from the pricing and pretension at the Edinburgh Ivy On The Square, this generic operation is an attempt to carve out a classier niche that sits above the Cote chain. By classy, I mean significantly more expensive, and in no way worth the price tag. I wonder how many people have already eaten at the Ivy On The Square, submitted the faux glamour to sober reflection, then concluded that the food choice is terminally boring, the ingredients, which are unexceptional, are both crudely executed and indefensibly overpriced? If Noel Coward, a habitué of the original Ivy, was alive I’m sure he’d make some sardonic observations on how it had been traduced.
It’s a tedious menu – the sort you get in international hotel chains – with lots of repeat ingredients. Truffle tramps its odiferous footprint all over it; yoghurt, and watermelon proliferate. Mayonnaise acts as a chameleon: with yuzu, wasabi, more truffle. The Ivy seems fixated on Gran Moravia, a "parmesan-like" cheese made in the Czech Republic, and creamed or mash potatoes. With the exception of Isle of Mull cheddar, the Ivy On The Square seems to serve ingredients available on speed dial from any number of restaurant suppliers. Uninspired, I eventually manage to work up some enthusiasm for chicken or pork Milanese (£15.75), but neither is made with free-range meat, so that option disappears. But the Ivy chain’s investors will doubtless appreciate the chunky gross margin on ingredients in this and other dishes.
Sourdough bread has an oddly elastic crust, and a borderline mouldy, almost greasy taste. Truffle arancini sock you in the mouth with a persistence that tastes as if the truffle paste used had flavouring or flavour enhancer in it. Crispy duck, harder and sweeter than toffee popcorn, as if someone has lost the plot in the condiment section of a Chinese supermarket, comes with partially burnt cashews, watermelon, beansprouts, coriander and a dressing that takes me back to cinnamon ball sweets.
The Ivy has a brazen nerve to charge £13.50 for its shepherd’s pie: miserly beef-lamb mince, a scraping of mash, a grating of cheese, a jug of preternaturally cloying, glossy brown gravy. "Baked sweet potato" (it tastes boiled), a teaspoon of yoghurt and smear of green stuff purporting to be "kale pesto" adds on £3.75. And that’ll be £16.95, thank you very much, for "blackened cod fillet" struck dumb by another cocktail of misunderstood Asian condiments, and served on a burnt banana leaf. Eastern cuisines make many wonderful dishes with fish and banana leaves, but this cack-handed, illiterate effort doesn’t figure in them. I won’t dwell on the glaring gastronomic ignorance and cognitive dissonance in the idea of "yuzu mayonnaise", or its pretty, but hard-to-like accompaniment of blanched bok choi and radishes that taste like stagnant water.
By this point we’re thoroughly out of sorts – poor food, brusque, harassed service, stupidly small, cramped tables, the background rumble of extractor fans or similar – there’s no celeb-y style here. We share one dessert, "apple tart fine", a lazy corruption of the French "tarte fine aux pommes", a mean, slight confection with barely a quarter of an apple on it. I’m not convinced that the pastry tastes all-butter, and the ostentation of its warmed, flamed Calvados merely adds a burnt alcohol whiff. The addition of crumbled honeycomb and baby leaves is a further cry for help.
It’s not possible to roll out a template for great restaurants. They aren’t simple to create or to maintain. There can only really be one Ivy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here