WHEN you rock up to a dinner party and the electric gates slide open to reveal a home akin to Hogwarts, you know it’s going to be a special night.
I was extra excited because I had been privy to the wine selection earlier, hand-picked from our host’s personal cellar. These showstoppers had worked every day of ageing into some of the best wines I’ve ever had the pleasure to drink, and I was extremely grateful for the experience.
The big question every wannabe socialite must ask in the morning is, “was it worth it?" In this instance, it most definitely was and it made me realise that guzzling discounted supermarket bottles of plonk is a false economy. There is nothing truer in wine than, "you get what you pay for".
As most of us are muggles and a gate is what keeps the child from hurling themselves down the stairs – there is a way of getting both value for money and a great experience.
The old world producers are experimenting with historic regional grapes you’ve probably never heard of, that usually taste better than their well-known varietal cousins.
These are handcrafted wines by small producers without big marketing departments or lavish headquarters to support.
There’s France with its Corbieres from Languedoc, which gets better with age but brilliant anytime, or Portugal’s Vinho Verde region with its Alvarinho that comes with a surprise effervescence. However, for me, one stands head and shoulders above the rest. Spain’s Jumilla region with its Monastrell is my favourite.
The key is to experiment and look at wines over £7, and next time you have neighbours round for some liver and fava beans, leave the chianti alone and pour them a great Romanian Sangiovese.
Graham Suttle is the managing director of Kained Holdings which has nine venues including The Finnieston and Porter & Rye in Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here