IT might be time for England supporters to rethink their attitude towards their favourite Australian player.
The once-hapless Mitchell Johnson, who often seemed to better threaten the slip cordon rather than the stumps, was worryingly accurate at Emirates Old Trafford on Sunday as he undermined the home side's attempts to reach Australia's 315 for seven.
Adam Voges, the Australian all-rounder, believes the quick bowler will respond to the inevitable jibes of the crowd today simply by taking more wickets at Edgebaston. "The crowd don't miss him, do they?" he joked. "Every opportunity they get, even in Scotland. I think he relishes it. He's been outstanding. When you're bowling 90mph plus and swinging the ball, that's a challenge for any batsmen. If he can do that consistently throughout the series, I hope that will go a long way towards us winning it."
Johnson dominated England's openers with a devasting new-ball spell, and he could easily have been better rewarded than by figures of two for 36. The brute of a delivery he produced to dismiss Jonathan Trott for a duck was a warning blast across England's boughs, and a far cry from some of the wretched displays which have blighted the left-armer's career.
There is a caveat to all this, though - namely the absence of England's top-order grinders, as well as the first-string bowling attack which would certainly set lower targets to chase, relieving pressure on their batsmen.
That decision to rest their best players was criticised recently by former captain Michael Vaughan, but Ashley Giles, the England coach, said he believed his former teammate had tweeted harshly and hurriedly that a partial ticket refund should be due to short-changed spectators.
"It's harsh - I think it was said in haste by Michael," he said. "This is an exciting side to come watch."
It will also be a side containing young players - like all-rounder Ben Stokes - hungry to stake their claim for a place in the team. "This exposure is crucial," insisted Giles. "It's hard on these young guys at times because we're asking them to do a lot. But we're asking them to do because we believe we can."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article