I note with interest more stories in The Herald about Rudolf Hess's landing/crashing in Eaglesham. While researching the history of Bonnyton Golf Club, Eaglesham, I was fortunate to able to interview Bill Chambers, the son of Archie Chambers, the owner of the golf club during the war.
At dusk on May 10, Bill, who was about 17 at the time, was down at an old barn on Floors Farm which is adjacent to the course. He was showing off to his girlfriend his skill at shooting bats. (You could do thing like that in those days.) He had just fired his shotgun at a bat above him when a plane flew low overhead and crashed in a nearby field. He ran around frantically telling everyone that he had shot down a German plane but, of course, no-one would believe him. A few days later the news leaked out about Hitler's deputy, Rudolf Hess, parachuting into Scotland in a vain attempt at appeasement with the Allies. But to the day he died, Bill claimed he had shot down Hess.
Arthur Yaffy, 7 Glenville Gate, Busby, Glasgow. No doubt you will receive varying accounts of the Hess landing (Letters, October 3). This is the first suggestion that RAF personnel were promptly on the scene. Following swift action by a local farm worker, both the police and Home Guard attended.
I would suggest that either of these, or a combination of both, was guarding the crashed plane (rather unsuccessfully as outlined in Ronald Barnet's letter). For the record, pieces of silk parachute were "passed down" to local police families (mine included) for several years after the much-publicised incident. This is indicative that Hess used the parachute in his unsuccessful mission.
Allan C Steele, 22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article