First Minister Alex Salmond yesterday refused to give a firm commitment on when the M74 extension around Glasgow will finally take place.
Mr Salmond was pressed on the matter by Frank McAveety, the Labour MSP for Glasgow Shettleston, during First Minister's Questions at Holyrood.
Mr McAveety said the extension contract had to be finalised within 90 days - and claimed it was being held up because of "behind-closed-doors negotiations" between the SNP and the Greens, who oppose the project.
Earlier this week, The Herald revealed that senior Scottish Government officials were in talks with Interlink M74, the sole consortium to bid for the construction.
Mr McAveety said the proposed five-mile motorway extension, which is expected to cost between £375m and £500m, will be the country's most important infrastructure project over the next 10 years.
"Not just in economic growth but to make the Commonwealth Games, in your words, the best-ever," Mr McAveety told Mr Salmond.
And he asked: "Would he agree with me that this project is far too important to be left to sometimes behind-closed-doors negotiations with the Greens, and he should maintain his commitment to this development by ensuring that the contract is signed within 90 days?"
Mr Salmond called on Mr McAveety to produce evidence to support his claims and said it was arguable that other planned projects were of equal significance.
He said project was "huge", but added: "No-one surely in this chamber would suggest that value for money and proper considerations of tenders is something that should be overlooked in pursuit of completing a vitally important infrastructure project?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article