BOTH Patrick Kirkwood and Alex Orr (February 19) quite rightly condemn the LibDems for their ludicrous attacks on the SNP and personal attacks on Alex Salmond. They are also correct to attack the LibDems for their refusal to hold a referendum on Scottish independence.
However, both Mr Kirkwood and Mr Orr could strengthen their case if they could persuade the SNP to agree to a referendum on membership of the EU, rather than dogmatically declare that an independent Scotland will be a member.
The party has agreed a referendum on leaving the UK, rather late in the day has also agreed a referendum on adoption of the euro, although why it has rejected the idea of a Scottish currency is beyond me; therefore it only makes sense, as well as being democratic, to offer a referendum on membership of the EU.
Jim Fairlie, Finance Spokesman, Free Scotland Party, 1 St Ninians, Heathcote Road, Crieff. THERE is a very simple answer to the Nationalist bleating and anguish over the independence referendum they feel is being denied them. All that is required is for the SNP to get 50% of the vote at the Holyrood elections in May - ie, to be the choice of half of the 50% of the electorate who will bother to turn out.
Surely if even one-quarter of the electorate feel strongly enough about independence they will go out and vote for the SNP; if other factors influence their choice of party then, clearly, independence is not considered important enough. If the separatists cannot persuade even that very modest number of Scots of the rightness of their campaign to break up the UK, then even the most blinkered must accept they are fighting a lost cause.
Alexander McKay, 8/7 New Cut Rigg Edinburgh. I WAS interested to read the ranted response of Alex Salmond to Liberal Democrat accusations of xenophobia within the SNP. "Outrageous and unacceptable," he cried, "disgusting slur," he screamed, "basest insults," he sobbed. Genuine indignation or not, that's for us, the public, to decide.
What I found so staggering was that his claim that the LibDems were being "totally hypocritical" was itself a blatant example of hypocrisy as Alex Salmond has for years found it perfectly OK to describe the Conservatives as the "anti-Scottish Tories". Perhaps he could explain how his own comments differ from the "unacceptable" accusation of xenophobia made against the SNP?
Voters support the Scottish Conservatives because they have continued to stand up to the Lib-Lab government in Scotland long after Alex Salmond abandoned the Scottish Parliament for London.
He went south and left the SNP in the hands of a group who have opposed the Scottish Executive with all the strength of a gnat - no pun intended. Now he wants back in but it appears he's learned nothing from his time away.
Alex Salmond is the master of mudslinging, but now he's acting like a little playground bully who's been slapped back and has now run off sobbing to the teacher. What he should be doing is apologising immediately to the hundreds of thousands of Scottish Conservative supporters he's repeatedly insulted with his own "outrageous", "disgusting" and "unacceptable" comments.
Douglas Pattullo, 7 Comely Bank Grove, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article