It is now clear that the trimming they have undertaken so far will not be sufficient for the radical cuts required over the next three years to overcome the double whammy of decreased funding and growing demand for services.
The need for a 25% to 35% reduction in costs by local authorities identified by accountants Pricewaterhouse-Coopers will come as a shock to many council employees. As the result of an examination of the spending of 20 of the largest authorities in England as well as Scotland, it does not take account of all local variations. For example, the prediction of a significant move from private to local authority schools is unlikely to be as significant in Scotland. However, other trends, such as an increase in the care budget due to the growing number of elderly people and fewer paying for private care as a result of the financial downturn, will impact across the board.
The central analysis, that the way to tackle the problem is with radical action now, is the correct one. Some of the ideas put forward in the PwC report, such as charging for services which have long been free, will be particularly unpalatable in Scotland’s council chambers. Nevertheless, there is already a recognition that the looming funding gap makes this the time to think the previously unthinkable. The eight councils around the Clyde Valley which are currently exploring ways of amalgamating back-office functions deserve credit for breaking down barriers, not only between council fiefdoms, but in related areas such as health boards and emergency services. Councils across the land are engaged in different forms of staff reduction, but the trick will be to achieve savings while protecting the quality of essential services. With that focus, the financial crisis could at least be turned into an opportunity for improving efficiency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article