According to The Daily Telegraph, the MoD employs proportionately more civilians than any of the other 27 countries which make up the Western alliance.
Meanwhile, figures released under the Freedom of Information Act showed the MoD spent more than £61 million last year on public relations.
It included £55.2 million on publicity and advertising, £2 million on employing 35 press officers and five support staff at MoD headquarters, and £3.9 million on employing 68 marketing and external communications staff.
The MoD said its total of 85,730 civil servants - compared to 174,030 trained military personnel - included many specialists such as scientists, engineers and intelligence analysts as well as bureaucrats.
However, shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said it was clear too much was being spent on administration.
“It is essential that our defence spending supports our military capability,” he said.
“We can’t afford to carry the burden of a bloated administration at a time when troops on the frontline face shortages.
“We cannot have a situation where the armed forces are at war but Whitehall is not.”
The MoD said the number of civil servants had fallen sharply from a total of 109,000 four years ago.
“The civilian workforce of the MoD provides vital support for the armed forces on the frontline and many of their skills are not available within the services,” a spokesman said.
“The 85,730 staff includes intelligence analysts, MoD police officers and scientists and engineers developing equipment to protect our forces. Many of them have deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan in key roles.
“We have taken steps to reduce the civilian workforce wherever we can do so without putting troops at risk, and the total number of civil servants has fallen by 23,000 since 2005.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article