The news, which the company said had no impact on jobs, comes just weeks after Diageo announced it is closing its Johnnie Walker bottling plant in Kilmarnock with the loss of 700 jobs, with another 200 jobs going at the Port Dundas distillery in Glasgow.
Christian Porta, chief executive and chairman of Chivas Brothers, said: “Market conditions have been tougher in the last 12 months.
“We have reduced some distilleries running on a seven day week to five days a week just to be a little bit on the cautious side.”
He acknowledged this is on the back of reduced growth expectations in the near term.
Chivas Brothers, which is owned by French drinks giant Pernod Ricard, controls around 20% of the Scotch whisky market. Its whisky sales have suffered in the past six months of 2009, with volumes of Ballantine’s down 4% and Chivas Regal off 5% year-on year.
Porta said that the company is continuing with plans to double output at Glenlivet, where sales volumes were up 5% year-on-year in the fist half.
He added that it is keeping open the previously mothballed Braeval and Allt-A-Bhainne distilleries reopened in the past couple of years.
“We haven’t gone back and closed them down again. We just reduced the output and we will see how quickly the market recovers,” Porta said. “We are very optimistic about the long term. We believe that the demand for Scotch whisky will continue to grow.”
He said the industry should not repeat what he called the “mistake” of the 1990s when production was cut back sharply after the Asian financial crisis.
Asked which distilleries have cut back production, a spokeswoman said: “I cannot say which distilleries. We are just adjusting levels of distilling.
“That doesn’t represent any sort of job cuts.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article