ONE of the best examples of multi-racial Scotland at work is Shawlands Academy on the south side of Glasgow.
At the last count, there were more than 50 languages being spoken in the playground, including Punjabi, Urdu, Arabic, French and Polish.
For Ken Goodwin, headteacher at the school since 1999, ensuring all pupils are catered for in such a diverse cultural setting has been a challenge. But he also believes the richness of the school's make-up is a wonderful opportunity.
"In terms of ethnicity, nationality, and language, we are stunningly diverse here and even over the past few weeks we have enrolled new arrivals from the European Union, many of whom do not speak English, " he said.
"On the one hand, the diversity can be wonderfully enriching, but it does pose significant challenges where teachers are delivering a subject in English to a group of pupils with a wide range of linguistic ability."
Mr Goodwin said one of the key lessons learned by the school was that teaching pupils in their preferred language as well as in English was the best way to support their development at school, although so far opportunities were limited.
"Enabling children to take part in discussions in their own language is easiest in terms of Punjabi and Urdu because we have a large number of teachers who speak those languages, but it is more difficult to make that kind of provision for everyone, " he said.
"At the moment, we have kids who sit exams in languages such as Arabic using a system developed in England so at least these children get a qualification in those subjects, but it would be nice to see greater development in this area in Scotland.
"I think it is inevitable that the Scottish Qualifications Authority will have to address the growing linguistic diversity which exists in Scotland by allowing people to get certificates in their preferred language. There should be parity of esteem among all languages, such as Chinese, Arabic and Punjabi, to recognise that Scotland is now a very diverse country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article