UNLIKE his peers - Dylan, Neil Young, Van Morrison - there is clearly no such thing as a Paul Simon obsessive. I doubt he loses much sleep over this. Considered appreciation seems more appropriate and entirely his due - and if most of the audience for the first date of his first UK tour in 15 years is of the older vintage of popular music fan, there are enough young enthusiasts to indicate that the tradition of Simon-fondness is being passed on.
Beforehand, I'd have bet on a set that focused on the fine new Eno-co-produced Surprise album with a smattering of tunes from earlier solo discs, but instead he ranged much wider than even someone with only Simon and Garfunkel's Greatest Hits at home had any right to expect.
Fronting a stunning octet of musicians (including the legendary Steve Gadd on drums, and the larger-than-life Mark Stewart on guitars, baritone sax and whistles in a too-long Royal Stewart tartan kilt) and playing much of the trickiest guitar figures himself, Simon included only a few tracks from the new disc alongside songs from Graceland, Still Crazy and just about every other milestone in his remarkably varied career.
If the dead hand of Hall Four's awful acoustic initially threatened to kill the subtleties of the musicianship, and there were lapses in the pacing of the set later on, by half-way through the valuefor-money two hours it was more than clear that this was a gig to be talked of for years to come.
The real surprise, though, was the inclusion of so much material from the Simon and Garfunkel era. There was a distinct rockabilly flavour to Mrs Robinson, a cheery singalong to The Boxer (not that Simon was likely to make that easy for those who still giggle at the line about Seventh Avenue whores) and - astonishingly, really - even Bridge Over Troubled Water, revealed anew as a classic country song.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article