Beleaguered Scottish Labour leader Wendy Alexander today announced her resignation, drawing to a close a saga stretching back nearly a year.
Ms Alexander quit with an angry attack on what she said was a "partisan" ruling and a "breach of natural justice".
The announcement comes after Holyrood's Standards Committee ruled she should be suspended from Parliament for one day for failing to declare to donations to her leadership campaign.
Earlier today, Labour MP David Marshall announced he is to quit the Commons, piling further by-election pressure on under-fire Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
Ms Alexander said the row over the donations had become a "distraction" from the real issues facing Scotland. She said she was the victim of a "partisan" decision by the committee and claimed there had been a "breach of natural justice".
Ms Alexander's departure now presents Labour with the prospect of a leadership contest in Scotland.
She announced her resignation in a statement delivered before TV cameras at Scottish Labour headquarters in Glasgow. Her voice still hoarse from a throat infection, and on the day after her 45th birthday, Ms Alexander announced her decision to resign following the decisions this week of Holyrood's Standards Committee.
Ms Alexander said: "I hope the events of recent days will lead to reflections by all MSPs and parliament officials on the appropriateness, objectivity and effectiveness of our current procedures.
"I acted in good faith and the written advice of parliamentary authorities. I believe there has been a breach of natural justice in a partisan decision," said Ms Alexander.
But she said the parliamentary process - "if not its conclusion" - deserved respect.
Ms Alexander went on: "I judge this issue has become too much of a distraction from the real issues that should dominate our public life."
These, she said, were the "challenges, cares and concerns" of communities across Scotland.
She went on: "The process of successive SNP inspired complaints and investigations has been unrelenting and will continue into the autumn, almost a year after the initial complaint.
"My pursuers have sought the prize of political victory with little thought to the standing of the parliament.
"Some may feel they have achieved a political victory but wiser heads will surely question at what price."
She said it was clear that "vexatious" complaints would dominate headlines as long as she remained and went on: "I cannot ask Labour supporters in Scotland for further forbearance."
She said she wanted colleagues to be aware of her decision as soon as possible and deputy leader Cathy Jamieson would take the helm over the summer.
Ms Alexander said Labour over the past year had made progress in renewing policies and reconnecting with voters while the SNP's "broken promises, spending cuts, U-turns and policy failures" were becoming more apparent.
"I have sought to lead Labour in the Scottish Parliament with commitment and conviction without indulging in the personal attacks so fashionable in current Scottish politics," said Ms Alexander who concluded her short statement by saying she intended to stay on as an MSP in Paisley North.
Scotland's Deputy First Minister and SNP deputy leader and Nicola Sturgeon said the resignation suggested splits within Labour in Scotland.
She said: "While Wendy Alexander has been author of own misfortune, there can be no doubt that the information on her illegal campaign donation could only have come from within the inner circles of the Labour Party.
"For months, there has been an unanswered question in Scottish politics - who within Scottish Labour leaked the information which provoked the serious investigation, culminating in Wendy Alexander's resignation?
"As Labour face another leadership trauma, her likely successors would do well to watch each other as well as their political opponents.
"Decay from within is characteristic of the decline of the New Labour project, and Wendy Alexander's resignation is a symptom of this wider malaise."
Ms Alexander was followed to the microphone by Cathy Jamieson who said Ms Alexander's resignation had been accepted "with deep regret".
"Ever since this process began, anybody who knows Wendy Alexander has not for one minute questioned her integrity," said Ms Jamieson.
"With this decision she has put the Scottish Parliament and the Labour party above her own personal interests."
Ms Jamieson went on to argue the affair had raised wider issues about the parliamentary process. Ms Alexander had followed the code of conduct, had sought advice from parliament and received "unambiguous" legal advice.
Holyrood's Standards Commissioner, Dr Jim Dyer, had subsequently decided this advice was wrong and Ms Alexander had been "penalised" by the Standards Committee for following the advice of parliamentary authorities.
"This has profound implications for all MSPs," said Ms Jamieson. "The procedure has been abused and manipulated for political ends.
"The pursuers of Wendy Alexander have put partisan interest ahead of those of the parliament and wiser heads will question at what price."
Ms Jamieson echoed Wendy Alexander's complaint that the controversy had overshadowed the concerns of ordinary people.
"Wendy Alexander has set up the platform for Labour to reconnect with the people of Scotland and we will be taking forward this agenda over the summer and beyond.
In a statement, Ms Alexander's brother Douglas Alexander, the secretary of state for international development, said: "This has been a very tough decision in very difficult circumstances and I understand Wendy's characteristic instinct to put the Labour Party interests first. She is a woman of outstanding talent and as a family we care about her very much."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article