The Royal Navy's nuclear submarine force has shortages of trained specialists amounting to more than one in five of certain key sections of its Trident missile and hunter-killer boat crews.
Figures obtained by The Herald show that the four strategic and nine attack submarines have 28% shortfalls in senior nuclear engineering officers, a 23% deficit in sonar and sensor operators, and are 20% below requirement for strategic weapons systems' junior ranks. Communications experts and tactical warfare submariners, whose job is to operate conventional weaponry such as torpedoes, Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles and anti-shipping mines, are in short supply to the tune of 13% and 24% respectively.
A Royal Navy spokeswoman admitted that there were recruitment and retention issues for the "silent service" but said the priority was nuclear safety. "The one thing we never compromise on is the safety of the reactors. Those compartments are always fully manned and maintained to the highest standards. That said, there are shortages at certain specialist pinch-points which we are now addressing.
"Submariners are a very special breed and submerged patrols for weeks at a time are not everyone's cup of tea. But there are shortfalls across the navy as a whole. We are trying to find ways to boost recruitment across the spectrum to ensure that we have a trained manpower pool to crew not only the future Astute attack boats, but also the two new carriers and Type 45 destroyers for the surface fleet."
The missile-carrying Vanguard-class Trident boats normally spend up to three months on patrol somewhere deep beneath the Atlantic, while the attack boats spend up to two months submerged.
All four Vanguard submarines and the last two surviving Swiftsure-class attack boats are based at Faslane on the Clyde. HMS Superb, the oldest attack submarine in the fleet, is limping 4000 miles back to the UK on the surface after damaging her main sonar on rocks in the Red Sea on Monday.
As reported exclusively by The Herald yesterday, the 32-year-old boat is likely to be decommissioned rather than repaired if the cost of replacing her is uneconomic.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article