Mark Bulstrode
A 16-YEAR-OLD pilot crashed to his death after being confused as he prepared to land, an inquest heard yesterday.
Sam Cross, from Hornchurch, east London, died when his single-engined plane plunged into a park in Southend, Essex, in July 2006.
The inquest, held in Southend, heard the teenager had been told to delay landing at Southend Airport and to circuit the area instead.
Steve Lane, air traffic control officer, said he issued the guidance because another aircraft was arriving at a faster speed, but told the jury it "would have been an entirely different decision-making process" had he known of Sam's limited flying experience.
He said he would not have issued the instruction if he had been in possession of all of the facts.
"Had I been aware he was a student, a low hours student, it would have been an entirely different decision-making process," he told the jury. I would have been extremely reluctant to deviate the (aircraft) from what he expected to do."
Brian Andrews, who was a chief flying instructor at Seawing Flying Club when Sam was a member, said: "He would have found that very confusing at that stage."
He said Sam was not trained in the manoeuvre and added: "We have never asked a student to do an orbit at low height."
The inquest heard that national guidelines have been changed following the incident. Pilots are now required to tell air traffic controllers if they are a student. Witnesses reported seeing the plane falling from the sky in a "corkscrew" fashion a short time after Sam's flight path was diverted.
The inquest was told Sam's parents, Yvette and Jim, and their other sons, Jimmy and Danny, were not attending the hearing. They wrote a letter to coroner Peter Dean, which said: "It's not that we can't be bothered, it's just that we can't mentally and physically attend."
The inquest was adjourned.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article