UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage has named controversial former MP Enoch Powell as his political hero, in a magazine interview published today.
Mr Powell was sacked from the Conservative frontbench and marginalised politically following his notorious "rivers of blood" speech in 1968, when he warned immigration would lead to racial violence.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne criticised Mr Farage for his choice, telling Total Politics magazine: "Of all the Great British heroes that Nigel Farage could have cited - people of the stature of Elizabeth I through to Winston Churchill - he chooses a second-rate politician whose only ability to get into the headlines was based on a revolting dalliance with racism."
But Mr Farage said he was not thinking of the "rivers of blood" speech when he named Powell as his hero, and dismissed Mr Huhne's attack as "immature".
The Ukip leader told the Press Association: "You can agree or disagree with much of the Powell doctrine, but his belief in the state having less of a say over our lives, in us not having our laws made in Brussels and having sensible controls over our borders - whilst his language may seem out-of-date now, the principles remain good and true."
On issues like homosexuality and capital punishment, Powell was "one of the most liberal post-war MPs", Mr Farage said.
He added: "I would never say that Powell was racist in any way at all. Had we listened to him, we would have much better race relations now than we have got."
Although Powell's cause was taken up at the time by right-wing Tories as well as dockers and meat porters, who went on strike demanding his reinstatement, he has since found few supporters in mainstream politics.
In 2007, Nigel Hastilow resigned as a Conservative prospective parliamentary candidate after saying that Powell "was right and immigration has changed the face of Britain dramatically".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article