Holyrood standards watchdog Dr Jim Dyer has claimed he was put under undue political pressure in his final year.
In his last annual report after two terms in office he has said his successor should be made more independent by not having to apply for a second term, and insists that independent legal advice is the cornerstone of the role.
He told The Herald last night: "Independence is a crucial aspect of the role."
In his report, Dr Dyer claimed: "When the parliament, early on in its life, chose a method of dealing with conduct complaints, it laid great store by having an independent investigator but there are at times pressures that potentially constrain that independence.
"In my report I have encouraged my successors to be vigilant to protect the independence of operation, which is central to public confidence in the commissioner role. As a recent high-profile investigation demonstrated, independent legal advice is an essential component of the commissioner's independence."
Dr Dyer was forced to spend more than £18,000 on legal costs last year, on matters including the investigations into former Labour leader Wendy Alexander's campaign donations.
He said complaints over the past year added to the total bill, which was almost three times higher than in 2005-06.
He said: "The increased legal costs for 2007-08 reflect the complexity of complaints going to stage-two investigation during the year, including a high-profile case."
Dr Dyer referred to legal challenges and highlighted insufficient guidelines.
The legal bill for 2007-08 was £18,416 compared with £11,468 the previous year and £6,794 in 2005-06.
Dr Dyer said 23 complaints were lodged.
He considered 19 of the complaints but took forward just three between April 2007 and March 2008.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article