After nearly six weeks of investigation, the international gymnastics federation, FIG, has concluded that China's Olympic gold medal team at the Beijing Games were old enough to compete.
However, question marks remain over the team that won bronze in Sydney eight years ago, and some will continue to be sceptical that there has been a cover-up on this year's Olympic result.
A FIG statement yesterday said: "Originals of official documents received from the Chinese Gymnastics Association, specifically passports, identity cards and family booklets or household registers, confirm the ages of the athletes."
Gymnasts must be 16 in Olympic year. But two members of the 2000 squad: Dong Fangxiao and Yang Yun, remain under scrutiny: "The FIG does not consider the explanations and evidence provided to date in regards to these athletes as satisfactory."
Dong's credentials for Beijing this year suggest she was only 14 in 2000, said FIG secretary general Andre Gueisbuhler. Yang, who won a bronze medal on asymmetric bars in 2000, said in an interview on state TV that she was 14 in Sydney. Faced with the possibility of being stripped of her medal, Yang now claims it was a slip of the tongue.
Yet there has been no adequate explanation for records at China's General Administration of Sport which were penetrated by hacker Mike Walker. These records, which should have been based on the same documents submitted to FIG, showed two of this year's gold medal team were under age. Indeed, one of them was reported last year as being 13 by the official Chinese news agency, Xinghua.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article