Scottish secretary Jim Murphy today attacked the SNP over the economic woes facing the smaller of independent states previously hailed as the "arc of prosperity" by Alex Salmond.
Mr Murphy said Iceland, Ireland and Norway have now been branded the "arc of insolvency" after recent problems.
They had been heavily cited by the Nationalists in opposition as an example that a small, independent Scotland could follow.
"Look at this arc of prosperity, what some commentators are now calling calling the arc of insolvency: Iceland, Ireland and Norway," Mr Murphy told a Sunday newspaper.
"Iceland as a country is on the verge of bankruptcy. Ireland is officially in recession. Ireland and Norway are trying to borrow from the US and Russia.
"That's not Scotland's destiny. Scotland isn't Iceland and it shouldn't be Iceland and as long as I'm doing this job, I don't want Scotland to be Iceland."
But the First Minister refuted Murphy's criticisms in an interview with BBC Scotland's Politics Show.
He said countries "large and small" were affected by the current crisis.
"Norway's latest forecast in the last few days for growth next year is just under 2%," he argued.
"There's nobody - nobody - thinks growth in the UK or Scotland is going to be 2%.
"Norway is doing extremely well in extremely difficult economic circumstances across the world.
"Would that we were in the Norwegian position, not two years ago, but right now."
Mr Salmond added: "This idea that the current economic circumstances is an argument against small countries is, I think, totally misplaced."
But a source close to the First Minister offered a more scathing rebuttal of Murphy's comments.
He said of Murphy: "His position is moribund. It's a redundant post and he is trying to make it look relevant. All the Scotland Office has done is bear responsibility for the Scottish election fiasco."
But he insisted: "This isn't the time for petty bickering. This is the time for decisive action. Everybody wants to see governments working together to lighten the burden on people's pocketbooks throughout Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article