The EU Health Commissioner Tonio Borg has said he used to hope education would reduce alcohol misuse, but learning and reflection had shown economics were more important, hence his support for a minimum unit price ("EU commissioner backs minimum pricing 'in principle'", The Herald, May 8).
Education and information are part of our decision-making, but as the advertising industry well knows, attitudes and availability matter more.
Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems was the first policy group to call for minimum pricing in 2007, drawing on our medical and nursing members' experience from their clinics and the international research base of what works. Minimum pricing is a novel concept but in our experience the more the idea is considered by individuals and institutions, the more it is supported as a solution which targets products most associated with harm and influences the behaviour of the people most at risk of harm.
The Court of Session's judgment last week, which was supportive of the legality of minimum unit pricing, largely on the grounds of its effectiveness in improving health and saving lives, showed those who undertake a detailed consideration with an open mind come to understand the value of this policy.
Irrespective of the views of doctors, nurses, parliamentarians, judges, publicans, small brewers and now senior EU figures, the Scotch Whisky Association and allies seem determined to use their resources to pursue every legal avenue to oppose the law passed in the Scottish Parliament last year. It is time for them to accept the Court of Session judgment and the will of Parliament and give this policy a chance.
Dr Peter Rice, Chairman, Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems,
12 Queen Street, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article