SOMETIMES, you really do have to check a paper's date to make sure it isn't April 1.
And, of course, you can triple-check stuff online to make sure you're not being drawn into an elaborate hoax.
Can it really be true that there are nearly 90 Bronze Age (5,000-years-old) fantastic, mysterious rock carvings on a stone measuring 42ft by 26ft (55ft by 35ft on some counts) in a field on the edge of Clydebank and that these have been deliberately hidden under the soil by "the authorities", so to speak, since 1964?
You. Are. Having. A. Laugh. Why was I not informed of this? Did I miss the memo? What in the name of the small man is the Cochno Stone? Even the name doesn't sound right. Back when I was a reporter, one of my best ever contacts would only refer to himself cryptically as "Mr Arbuthnot". Took me several months to realise he meant: Mr Arbuth Not.
Is this Coch No Stone? I'm getting into the realms of fantasy now, as top expert Captain Mainwaring might say. There is a stone, though not as we know it. From old photographs, taken before soil was heaped on it and vegetation subsequently grew, it's actually a flat rock. And it's covered in what are thought to be the finest collection of "cup and ring" carvings in Europe.
There are also spirals, a circled cross and two four-toed feet. Discovered by the Reverend James Harvey in 1887, it's an incredible array of ancient art, also sometimes known as the Druid Stone.
Cochno is the name of a historic estate where the noble Hamilton family had their seat. Today, the estate, and with it Cochno House (built in 1757 to a John Adam design), is owned by Glasgow University's School of Veterinary medicine. The stone lies off the Cochno Road near Clydebank's Faifley housing estate on land half owned privately and half by West Dunbartonshire Council.
In 1964, on the recommendation of Glasgow University archaeologists, the stone was buried under several feet of soil to protect it from vandalism which, in those relatively innocent times, appeared to consist of people adding their initials to the rock.
After that, the Cochno Stone and its carvings disappeared from view. May Miles Thomas, a film-maker who highlighted the stone in her feature The Devil's Plantation, about ancient landmarks in and around Glasgow, described the overgrown site in her blog as "a tangle of chain-link fencing, scaffold poles and dry stone wall".
The Cochno Stone also featured in Ronald Morris's The Prehistoric Rock Art of Southern Scotland (1981) and Harry Bell's Glasgow's Secret Geometry (3rd edition,1993). Both are hard to obtain now.But curiosity and surprise about the site are growing. History researcher Alexander McCallum is lobbying to have the stone uncovered.
Yesterday, a spokeswoman for West Dunbartonshire Council was quoted saying the authority would "seek professional advice on the implications of uncovering the area". A spokeswoman for Historic Scotland said it too would be "happy to support any considered and adequately resourced proposals to uncover it, in conjunction with the local authority and the landowner".
Meanwhile, the nation said: "Well, get on with it." It seems beyond absurd that these ancient carvings were buried under the soil and forgotten about. It's like a kind of reverse archaeology. They're the carvings that time, or somebody, forgot. As to what they mean, examine the evidence and let your imagination roam free. Theories advanced hitherto include a map of Clyde Valley settlements, symbolic portals of reincarnation, astronomical constellations, and ceremonial markers for human or animal sacrifice.
If only the Cochno Stone could speak. It would probably say: "Please do not cover me in soil." According to Mr McCallum, meanwhile, similar carvings can be found in Hawaii, India and Africa, which hints at a mind-boggling coincidence of cultural expression.
Given western Scotland's relatively rich collection of prehistoric sites, leylines and geographical geometry have also been adduced. You pays your money and you takes your choice; which would be a lot easier to do if we could actually see the carvings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article