This article appears as part of the Money HQ newsletter.
With the new government’s first Budget scheduled for 30 October, we’re starting to hear some hints and theories about what may be included in the statement.
What any changes will actually mean for everybody is yet to be fully understood and, unless there are significant leaks in advance, we won’t know the detail until the day.
But it pays to keep abreast of speculation.
What we do know
Prior to the election, Labour committed to:
- changes to the taxation of non-domiciles, although without certain rules
- charging VAT and business rates on private schools
- increasing stamp duty on residential property purchases by non-UK residents.
But it has ruled out:
- increases in tax for ‘working people’ i.e. headline rates of income tax, NICs and VAT; and
- increasing corporation tax above 25%.
What has there been speculation about?
In his Rose Garden speech on 27 August, Keir Starmer referred extensively to a “black hole” in the country’s finances and that things would have to get worse before they get better. He also referenced that the biggest burden would be borne by those with the broadest shoulders.
Most of what we know is based on the Labour manifesto and whilst it was silent on wealth – Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and Inheritance Tax (IHT) – and investment taxes, there is speculation that changes to some of these areas could be announced in the Budget:
- IHT relief changes
- higher tax on capital gains and changes to CGT exemption
- higher taxes on investment income
- pensions tax relief changes
- pensions tax free allowance changes
- Business Assets Disposal relief changes.
The speculation is founded on the acknowledgement that tax increases may be necessary to meet Labour’s commitment to address the fiscal challenges.
Pensions
Labour’s manifesto commits them to ‘undertake a review of the pension landscape’ which suggests that there will be no immediate changes to the annual allowance or the availability of tax relief.
We have seen speculation regarding the removal of (or restriction on) tax free cash, although this hasn’t come from the government who have stated that they don’t intend to change tax free cash on pensions.
And again, there is talk of flat-rate tax relief, although Rachel Reeves has stated that there is no plan to curb tax relief or for an immediate reinstatement of the Lifetime Allowance.
Capital Gains Tax
Given the warnings of tax increases likely in the Budget, there is understandable concern that changes to Capital Gains Tax (CGT) may be introduced. CGT speculation has meant that one particular question is increasingly being asked: Can CGT be changed mid-year?
The precedent of a new Chancellor making a mid-year change to CGT rates post-election already exists when George Osborne raised the CGT rate in his June 2010 Budget following the Conservatives' election victory.
Read more:
Money HQ | How important is saving for retirement?
For individuals and trusts, CGT is generally accounted for on a tax year basis, so a mid-year change causes none of the disruption that would be associated with income tax (or NIC) mid-year tweaks. Even residential property sales have a 60-day period for reporting/payment (although this special treatment did not exist in 2010).
The other question mark over an in-year change is whether more tax might be raised by deferring the change to 6 April 2025. So if the Chancellor wants to raise revenue as quickly as possible, waiting to enforce from April 2025 could deliver more in the short term.
Business Assets Disposal Relief
One of the major triggers of CGT is the sale of business assets. Currently, up to £1m of gains from the disposal of an interest in a qualifying business would be taxed at the lower rate of 10%. And whilst this could feature in the statement, it’s not thought to be a major target given the generally accepted importance of encouraging small businesses.
IHT
The forewarning of tax increases countered by the promise to not impact working people has understandably led to speculation regarding to inheritance tax (IHT) changes. But exactly if, what and how is not yet clear.
ISA allowances
We’ve seen no speculation on ISAs as yet.
Wealth Tax
With the government’s self-imposed constraints on income tax, NIC and VAT – and the potential limits on the amounts that could be collected from IHT and CGT increases – it’s perhaps unsurprising that there is some talk of the introduction of a separate Wealth Tax.
The government has not expressed any indication that this is part of their plans but recent union and media speculation has raised the subject.
The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) has called for “reforms to taxation, introduction of wealth taxes, and a redistribution of wealth”.
Get insightful financial advice every week straight to your inbox by clicking here.
A wealth tax could be a complex tax to create for a variety of reasons though, not least of all due to the challenges of asset valuation and liquidity to pay the tax.
While we can never be certain about what might be in the Budget and especially this year, most expect Wealth Tax to remain on the sidelines, despite the latest rumblings.
More likely is higher taxes on capital in the form of CGT and IHT, as has been widely forecast. And indirect wealth tax on residential property, through a reform of council tax is a possibility.
Ben Stark is a chartered financial planner with over a decade of experience advising businesses and families. He is partnered with St. James's Place Wealth Management.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here