This week, the Secret Teacher looks at discrepancies between how schools in affluent areas assess their students compared to others.
Having worked in a school within an affluent area, I have long believed that those schools assess their students with punishingly high standards.
These standards are much higher than those used by exam boards to assess students.
Their logic is that putting the fear of God into young people will make them study, study and study, and it makes their projections look good because they go from getting a C or D in their prelim to an A in the final.
I had only based that on my individual experience and the odd anecdote, but through conversations with parents of two separate students who I tutor in affluent areas, I have recently found out that one school is saying that all students doing National 5 and higher at this time of year are working at a low C level.
Monitoring, tracking and reporting is a vital aspect of teaching, because it’s evidence for the teacher that you’re taking the child’s individual needs into account, that you’re aware of the fact that you don’t have a bunch of clones in your classroom, and that they are all working at different levels and all have different needs.
That’s part of what makes the job difficult. It’s not flinging a textbook at a child and saying ‘just do that’. Think about individual needs. You never have two years the same.
Read more:
The Secret Teacher | 'Teachers can't help but eyeroll at the mere mention of in-service days'
When I write report cards and do my monitoring and tracking, if I were to try and get away with saying that everyone’s working at this one low level, I would instantly – and quite rightly – not only be the subject of parental complaints, but be dragged into the headteacher’s office and asked to prove it.
I wouldn’t be able to, because the evidence I have paints the same picture that you get nationally, which is that because I’m dealing with human beings, everyone’s levels are different. Some students are working at a straight A standard from the minute they get into the classroom, and others need the real journey. They need the progress, and they need to fail a few times.
I worry that the approach of these schools is actually quite detrimental, because they seem to feel like the way to achieve success is to instil fear and pressure, and to normalise fear and pressure as a means to success, when I think society is moving on from that and we’re trying to be more mindful of wellbeing and mental health.
I can say definitively that this particular school is doing this with their report cards. There might not be a collective knowledge that this is a trend, because parents will understandably just be thinking about their individual child. They won’t necessarily be wanting to know about class trends.
One of my colleagues, who is a mother of a child at the school, complained about this and had a meeting with their head of English, and said “I’m going to get my child a tutor.”
Sign up for The Secret Teacher and learn what teachers really think.
The head of the department tutted at her and said “no, she doesn’t need a tutor”, to which she replied “well, you’re saying she’s working at a low C, but she’s straight A for everything else, so why wouldn’t I get her a tutor?”.
It’s as if there’s this frustration that it doesn’t fit the narrative.
I remember working in a school and being asked to adjust the working grades – the level the child is currently working on in a given month – so that it fits the narrative of not doing so well right now, being able to make them feel the pressure and then the grades go and get massively inflated by the end.
It frustrates me.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel