We exclusively reported last week that the Scottish Government is to delay its blueprint for cutting harmful emissions in the fight against climate change, pointing the finger at the UK Government’s recent reversal of net zero measures.
Today one of our readers argues that this might be no bad thing as long as we use it as an opportunity to reset some of our policies, especially towards land use – and has some suggestions for the King.
Dave Morris of Kinross writes:
"Some delay to Scotland’s efforts to tackle global warning may not be a problem. Forthcoming events could lead to a better plan.
Later this month King Charles will give the opening address at COP28, the annual climate change summit for world leaders. Perhaps he will return with a determination to demonstrate, on his own land, how to mitigate the impacts of climate change through better land use. In the uplands capturing carbon through appropriate management of grazing animals and vegetation should become a primary objective. This requires fundamental changes to the way that the deer and grouse are managed on Balmoral estate. Such changes are essential if the royal family is to maintain its reputation as a significant voice in efforts to solve the climate and biodiversity crisis.
On his return from Dubai the King should be in early discussion with our First Minister. They need to agree what action to take at Balmoral. No doubt it will be explained to King Charles that the report of the Deer Working Group, commissioned by the Scottish Government and published in early 2020, highlighted Balmoral and its neighbouring estates as probably the worst area in Scotland for overgrazing by red deer, destroying the natural regeneration of montane and forest habitats. Such damaging land use, along with the widespread and continuing burning of grouse moors has to stop. These estates occupy the headwaters of many rivers in eastern Scotland, including the Dee, Don and Tay, with downstream communities greatly affected by what happens upstream. Stopping over-grazing and burning will bring immense relief to these communities and elsewhere. Regenerating all our uplands is urgent, before the next intense rain storms arrive, bringing further flooding and misery.
A delay in producing the next climate change plan will also give the Government the opportunity to propose fundamental changes to the financial incentives that support agriculture and forestry. Planting trees in the uplands, most of which involves the cultivation of peaty or organic soils, releases more carbon to the atmosphere, over decades, than is captured by the growing trees. This undermines other efforts that are being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and achieve net zero by 2045. Soil cultivation in the uplands needs to be minimised as planting grants are replaced with new incentives to employ more stalkers and gamekeepers to better control grazing and wildfires. The lowlands should become the focus for new tree planting.
The expansion of all field margins in the lowlands must be at the core of the new grant system. Planting trees for timber, fuel, shelter and wildlife fits well with other measures to create new habitats by limiting the application of artificial fertilisers and pesticides around field margins. And, with public rights of access to all field margins in Scotland, we could design the perfect system for increasing public contact with nature as well as improving the financial support base for all land managers.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel