This week, the Secret Teacher shares their thoughts on in-service days, and why for many in education the mere mention can be enough to set eyes rolling.
In-service days can very occasionally be quite good.
It’s like one of those classic rock bands who are constantly churning out albums. Occasionally you get a good song, but more often than not it’s like the recent Rolling Stones album.
I hate them.
More often than not you get put onto these really patronising, pointless school initiative Continuing Professional Development (CPD) courses. I’ve been to one or two that have been really special and helpful, but they are the exceptions.
I remember one of the first in-service days I attended when I was a student. This guy stood in front of all the teachers in the school with an empty cup in one hand and an open can of Coke in the other, and he said: “did you know that students have a lot on their mind?”
“You might just be thinking about your subject, but imagine this… It’s a difficult morning. Maths (pours Coke into cup). Geography (pours more Coke). English. Lost a pencil. Fell out with a pal…”
By this point he’s making a mess and there’s Coke all over the floor.
I remember turning round and looking at my colleague, and she was working on this beautifully drawn, shaded sketch of a phallus. That’s how bored she was and how useful she found it.
Read more:
Secret Teacher | School inspections should be unexpected and unannounced – for the teacher's sake
You don’t work in a school within a deprived area without an awareness of the fact that our kids are living in awful circumstances a lot of the time. What tends to happen is that schools have to do these things so that they can say they’ve done them. It’s a tick-box exercise to back up something that already exists, but there’s this obsession with evidence.
It can be very admin-heavy, with form-filling and self-evaluation tasks that overcomplicate what should be a simple process. Whether you’re evaluating a lesson, a year or results, self-evaluation should be as simple as looking at it and asking ‘what’s good, what’s bad and how can I learn from this?’. It’s as simple as that.
Instead, it becomes this very contrived, overly bureaucratic task which takes up a lot of time and you just sit there twiddling your thumbs, thinking about all the things you could be doing instead.
Another issue is that really noble things are given far too much time. I don’t need to listen to an hour-long presentation to know that Skills Development Scotland are doing a lot of good things for our school.
It’s that classic adage: ‘this could be an email’.
Sign up for The Secret Teacher and learn what teachers really think.
Maybe it wouldn’t sting so much if there was a better balance in terms of teaching time commitment and non-contact time, but right now the bureaucracy just appears to get in the way of it.
There should be CPT, but I would love it to be more of a streaming service model where we can pick and choose. There’s got to be a better way than dragging your entire staff through these things.
I would anticipate that any teacher reading this would have their own Coca-Cola story to tell. The in-service day is something people roll their eyes about, as much as it’s nice to be able to wear your jeans…
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel