The climate crisis demands rapid decarbonisation of the mobility and freight systems that enable and underpin our economy, yet progress has been painfully slow. In some important respects, progress has in fact begun to reverse.
The UK Government recently overhauled its £106 billion HS2 commitment, cancelling the northern section connecting Birmingham and Manchester. The planned railway will only link London with Birmingham, cutting down the route’s potential to reduce transport carbon emissions.
The Government also announced a five-year delay in phasing out petrol and diesel vehicles, creating another obstacle on the route to net zero and fostering confusion which impacts investment in and production of low-emission vehicles. In Scotland, the CalMac ferry controversy highlights escalating costs and delays in delivering a core transport link to more than 100,000 people, which is integral to the UK’s distributed network of island communities.
These problems squander billions of pounds of public funding previously committed to supporting the projects, and contribute to ongoing failures to meet decarbonisation targets. They also carry heavy social and economic consequences, from compulsory home purchases for poorly-planned projects to hardship for rural communities dependent on reliable transport. Deferring zero-carbon transport investments simply leads to higher future costs from inflation.
Each failed project and each broken promise contributes to ongoing uncertainty about net zero investment. Uncertainty and risk are critical barriers to the major cash injections needed to transform existing infrastructure, presenting threats on par with the carbon emissions we aim to eliminate.
There is widespread consensus that reform is essential. To achieve this, we must understand the interdependencies between transport decarbonisation, energy systems, and digital infrastructure.
With support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Department for Transport, Professor Phil Greening at Heriot-Watt University and I are leading an industry consultation called TransiT. We are connecting transport, energy and tech companies, communities and government to understand decarbonisation barriers and explore solutions like digital twins, which could help us de-risk the road to net-zero transport.
We need a whole-systems perspective spanning physical, digital and socioeconomic dimensions. The choices we make in one subdomain reverberate across the whole network.
Our net-zero transition is jeopardised by inertia from large investment risks in unproven technologies. We must also overcome barriers to adopting new service and business models. Key is creating verified models to demonstrate decarbonisation strategies, costs, reliability and resilience before deployment.
The integrated solutions we need don't yet exist. We urgently require leadership in digital model design and in developing ethical, secure data governance standards. Models must be transparent, accountable and focused on public good rather than narrow commercial interests.
From these challenges come opportunities: game-changing solutions for UK and international markets. Collaborative modelling helps visualise pathways, clarify choices, mitigate risks and build confidence in the decisions ahead. Our shared future depends on it.
There are no easy fixes or silver bullets. But through open collaboration, we can steadily assemble the pieces for a clean, just energy transition. The stakes could not be higher, but by working together, a sustainable future is within reach.
David Flynn is Professor of Cyber-Physical Systems at the University of Glasgow’s James Watt School of Engineering
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here