Wikipedia describes Ravenscraig as a "village" and a "new town", but when I travel there one sunny afternoon, it's all roads and roundabouts breaking vast areas of greenery fenced off for future construction. Wedged between Carfin, Motherwell and Shieldmuir, there is nothing there but a pub, a contemporary statue of a steelworker, and a regional sports facility.
I reach Ravenscraig through a series of new builds in Carfin; they are perfectly manicured but seem oddly disconnected from their surroundings. Most suburban developments I've seen are like this; they promise community on the roadside advertising boards, but in actuality, price out local people to leave behind an eery uniformity of cheaply constructed buildings with artificial grass in the backyard. There is no history of place, with the only remaining connection to the outside world conducted through SUVs and delivery vans. Is this what the promised Ravenscraig development will be like? That's what some folks in the area fear.
Ravenscraig, also known as Steelopolis, used to be the site of Ravenscraig Steelworks, the largest hot strip steel mill in Western Europe. Built in the 1950s, it operated and employed around 13,000 workers at its peak until its closure in 1992. The site played a crucial role in Scotland’s industrial history, contributing to the country’s economic growth. Privatisation of industries by the Thatcher government in the late 80s and the early 90s recession led to the plant’s closure, creating a significant blow to the local community as thousands of jobs were cut. This painful history is difficult to gloss over.
Today, the old site is almost totally demolished and after many years of planning, it is to be “regenerated” and redeveloped by Wilson Bowden Developments Ltd, Scottish Enterprise and Tata Steel. This new town promises 3,500 new homes, a town centre with 84,000m² of retail and leisure space, up to 216,000 m² of business and industrial space, major parkland areas, a new transport network, a sports facility, two new schools, a college and a hotel.
The plans are controversial, with some local residents and businesses of nearby towns worrying the new town will destroy jobs and businesses in the surrounding areas and wondering why places like Motherwell or Carfin couldn’t be redeveloped instead. Still, the council argues it will create much-needed jobs in the area.
There is a plethora of other questions to consider. How will the development of the new town not wash over the site’s complex history of extraction, community, labour, dereliction and toxic waste? Will it be properly decontaminated? How will it foster a sense of community when almost nothing will be publicly owned? To what extent have local residents been consulted in the redevelopment process and the vision of a new Ravenscraig? As trees grow through cracked concrete and wildlife returns to the area, couldn’t Ravenscraig be used as a case study in rewilding a brownfield site?
And finally, who will stand to benefit from the redevelopment: the working people or the investors?
Diyora Shadijanova is an award-winning multi-media journalist, editor and writer. This article was commissioned by the Scotland + Venice partnership around the themes of A Fragile Correspondence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here