Recently Etsy and Amazon have been outed for withholding funds from sellers, while Booking.com has made international headlines for being significantly overdue on payments to property owners who have listings on the website.
However, while these huge brand names may generate headlines, the reality is that many businesses of all sizes struggle to secure payments on time. In fact, the most recent data analysis shows that Scottish businesses have reported over 400,000 overdue invoices as of July 2023[.
Overdue payments - especially from a key customer, or high volumes from multiple customers -can leave businesses in paralysis. They can also trigger a domino effect by delaying payments to the company’s own suppliers, where they could be unable to pay staff and some could even need to consider whether the company’s solvency is at risk.
No business is immune to the late payments issue, so what can business leaders do?
The first step is prevention. Before entering a commercial relationship, check for negative online reviews, run a credit check to indicate financial risk, and ensure their own terms and conditions are clear, unambiguous and up to date - and make sure to send them to your customer before you supply anything to them.
When past the point of prevention, businesses should double down on credit control to ensure their system is proactive and consistent. They should issue a credit control letter or email if payment has not been made on time, and keep a record of follow-up phone calls to help should the customer continue to fail to make payment. The more consistent a business is in its credit control, the more likely it is that customers will prioritise their payments.
If these initial measures do not work, businesses can consider escalating the situation through a formal dispute resolution process. Litigation - court action - can provide a route to recovery where other routes have failed. If there is a genuine dispute about the goods or service supplied then mediation may be an option as it helps to resolve issues outside of court. This helps to preserve commercial relationships by encouraging communication and developing a solution that works for both businesses. If court action is defended, then it can undoubtedly become expensive and cause additional cashflow issues for businesses. Some firms such as Morton Fraser offer “success fee arrangements”, whereby businesses can litigate at no upfront cost to them in exchange of a greater portion of the amount that is recovered through a successful court decision. For businesses that would otherwise struggle to cover the cost of litigation, or are perhaps suffering due to a significant late payment, this could provide an alternative route if the chance of a success in the courts is high.
Experiencing a significant late payment or an accumulation of many is highly stressful to businesses. On the flip side, a business which is genuinely struggling to make payment will also be subject to stress. For companies that are unable to make payments or will need to pay late, a proactive approach is the best possible route to preserving commercial relationships and mitigating impacts on their trading partners. Those struggling to pay might consider communicating this early in order to agree terms or a payment plan that preserves the relationship and reduces the impact on both businesses.
Late payments create a vicious cycle within the business community. By taking preventative measures and communicating early, businesses can reduce the impacts and seek to break the cycle.
Nicola Ross is a partner in the commercial litigation team at Morton Fraser.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here