It’s a scene too horrible for most of us to contemplate. Trapped, in the dark, beneath the icy waves of the Atlantic Ocean with no way to communicate with the outside world, knowing that any chance of rescue diminishes with each breath as, bit-by-bit, the oxygen in your aquatic tomb is converted to carbon dioxide.
It’s little wonder that the story of five people – Shahzada Dawood and his 19-year-old son Suleman, Hamish Harding, French captain Paul-Henri Nargeolet and Stockton Rush, whose company made the vehicle in question – has held a grim fascination the world over, and that the revelation they likely died instantly due to an implosion of the craft brought a sort of cold comfort.
Some of it really has been grim. At least one US television network kept a countdown clock on the bottom right of the screen to indicate when the oxygen supply on Titan would run out, special rolling news broadcasts were dedicated to the search near the wreck of Titanic, so-called experts pontificated on what might be happening deep beneath the waves on live blogs.
Without wishing to diminish the deaths of those five people, it has been interesting to contrast both the media and public reaction to their fate with the reaction to a boat which sank off the coast of Greece carrying 750 men, women and children.
It’s common on social media to read people asking: “why aren’t the mainstream media covering THIS?”, usually while linking to some mainstream media outlet, and it would be untrue and unfair to say the latter incident hasn’t been covered. There is also, tragically, an aspect of familiarity. The old newspaper adage has it: “When a dog bites a man, that is not news, because it happens so often. But if a man bites a dog, that is news”. It’s estimated more than 2,000 people died trying to cross the Mediterranean last year – though the true figure may be much higher – while it’s not every day a couple of billionaires go missing on a voyage to Titanic.
Read More: Glasgow student onboard missing Titan submersible
Perhaps though we should ask ourselves – both as the media and as the people – why it appears we find it so easy to put ourselves in the shoes of those lost on Titan while being able to largely look past as tragedy unfolds on an almost daily basis on Europe’s border.
It’s been eight years since the world was chilled by the image of two-year-old Aylan Kurdi, a Syrian refugee found dead on a beach near Turkey, having drowned as he and his family sought to escape a brutal civil war. Within months though the boy’s father was impugned as a people smuggler, accused of trying to cross the sea to get dental treatment, smeared as someone trying to profit from the tragedy. Some of the darker corners of the internet alleged the whole thing had been faked, and within a year Nigel Farage was standing in front of a poster depicting desperate people trying to cross a border with the words BREAKING POINT.
Even some of the less vitriolic commenters on the refugee crisis will wonder aloud: “how could you put your child in that kind of danger?”, as though you wouldn’t already have to be terrified, desperate, to load on to a boat with hundreds of others and attempt to sail to a country, to a continent, which has made clear it doesn’t want you. Tragic as the demise of the passengers on Titan may be, its occupants were not impelled by some outside force to board the craft, which had not been certified as seaworthy by any regulatory agency. They boarded having paid a reported $250,000 for the kind of experience only the super-rich will ever have access to – Harding had previously flown to space and broken a world record for circumnavigating the globe. Should we blame Mr Dawood for taking his son aboard the doomed vessel? Of course not, but nor should we blame those who do so for far more pressing reasons.
Read More: 'You can see the pain in their faces': Refugees speak to Scottish Parliament
The mission the five were on contains in itself a grisly reminder of the dynamics at play. Of the 1,317 passengers known to have died aboard Titanic, 709 were third-class passengers. They were forbidden from interacting with the first and second-class guests on the ship, with grilled gates installed to keep them to the lower decks. When Titanic struck the fateful iceberg, there was little time for stewards to unlock them and permit people to escape. Around 75 per cent of third-class passengers perished.
Perhaps the issue is not so much a failure of empathy as one of imagination. Who among us can say we haven’t dreamed of what we’d do if we won the Euromillions jackpot – what we’d buy, where’d we’d go, what we’d experience? Most of us know we’ll never go space, or to see the wreck of Titanic, or own a Ferrari but we can imagine it, we can see it on our screens, read about it in our newspapers.
Of course, we can see, read, hear accounts from Ukraine, or Yemen, or Syria but it’s much harder to put yourself in the shoes of someone who feels they have to leave their country behind, make a dangerous journey with their family, often to somewhere where they cannot speak the language, with no guarantee they’ll be met with anything other than a door slammed in the face – if they reach the door at all.
Questions can and are being asked about the lifestyles and excesses of the super-rich, but it doesn’t take away from the fact their deaths were a tragedy. But so is drowning in the choppy waters of the Mediterranean, striving to reach a shore you’ll never touch with living hands. Do you know the names of any of the hundreds who met just that end last week, far less what they did for a living or where they went to school?
There was no live blog for them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel