Climate challenges are full of dilemmas. For every good idea for change there is a disruptor whose strong voice can explain why it is not. It’s like a game of Whac-A-Mole. This is true of the general landscape in Scotland, with schisms widened through political divides, rather than healed through acts of unity, clear intent and policies.
The soundness of decisions made by the Scottish Government, the pace of change, and absence of long-term implemtation plans and assessment of the net impact, have all been criticised in recent months by the expert Climate Change Committee and others.
The criticism begs the question: have the right choices been made? Electric vehicles, highways and systems have been baked into policies with no real evidence of deliverability at scale, or demonstration of the actual end-to-end net CO2 mitigation. Whac!
So where do our Scottish universities fit in? As charitable bodies, higher education institutions are mandated to work solely for the public good. Many, like my own, have been working for centuries to derive and assess new forms of energy, and are now pushing the frontiers for ethical and rapid energy transition. As such, universities are national, and indeed global, lighthouses of best practice, casting their light to provide leadership and develop confidence.
Universities embrace and model innovative pathways to Net Zero and beyond Net Zero – but they also carry the knowledge to assess and articulate the net impact of decisions around energy systems and society. Whilst some universities may turn the climate change challenge, adherence to the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and being the first to reach Net Zero into a "league table race" most are choosing to stretch themselves.
But back to the Whac-A-Mole. How can universities be arbiters of truth and sources of advice beyond their campus environs? There are four gamemaster roles.
First, to educate hundreds of thousands of students to become carbon literate, so wise personal and collective decisions can be made. At Heriot-Watt, we are developing a free carbon literacy programme for all staff, students and alumni worldwide. The tangible impact of such educational endeavours will yield more net impact to CO2 mitigation than any physical transformation to decarbonise our buildings.
Second, to assist national academies in articulating the pathways for policies and systems that will lead to a net zero lifestyle for Scotland. This is notably absent from national strategies, but desperately needed to build ambition and confidence for decarbonisation. The nation is aching for confidence and ambition to support much-needed actions.
The third role is to coalesce action by initiating trusted multi-partner consortia. This is well evidenced in the way universities work with industry and others. By working as part of a cluster of industries within a region, the challenge of decarbonisation becomes a shared endeavour, by which we will encourage collective regional action and funding. A key example of this is the UK-wide Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre (IDRIC) based at Heriot-Watt.
The final role is to drive new ethical economic thinking through frontier research in green finance, and models for a future-looking sustainable economy where impact investment and social benefit is valued.
It’s time to move from gaming to reality.
Richard A Williams is Principal & Vice Chancellor at Heriot-Watt University, based in Scotland, UAE and Malaysia.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here