A Glasgow MSP has called for an end to a tactic which is seeing commercial entities “exploit” a loophole to create “gargantuan” mural adverts on gable ends without receiving prior permission from the council.
It comes after a huge hand-painted advertisement by a nationwide shoe retailer on the side of a tenement building sparked local outcry and concern that Glasgow’s world-renowned gable end mural landscape could be at risk from “creeping commercialisation”.
The mural, commissioned by Clarks to advertise their desert boots as part of a new brand campaign, appeared on a gable end on Duke Street in the Dennistoun area of the city back in October.
Dennistoun Conservation Society questioned how Clarks “got the gig” for the mural, while Bafta Scotland award-winning photographer and filmmaker Chris Leslie expressed his worry that it could represent a “slippery slope to massive semi-permanent ads across the city”.
After being painted over weeks later, a spokesperson for Clarks informed The Herald that the mural “was only a temporary piece of art”.
In the wake of the outcry, a second huge commercial mural, commissioned by the Royal Bank of Scotland, also appeared on the side of a building in the city before being painted over weeks later.
READ MORE: Glasgow’s mural landscape ‘at risk’ from commercialisation
The mural was located on the side of the Victor Paris Bathrooms showroom off the Broomielaw – a popular spot which has previously been witness to temporary commercial murals by the likes of Facebook and sportswear brand Adidas.
Commenting on the mural, a spokesperson for RBS said: “Glasgow has a long and proud tradition of creating public art that can be enjoyed by everyone.
“With this in mind, the city felt the right location to install our first Royal Bank of Scotland mural in Scotland, at the heart of Glasgow’s International and Financial Services District.
“As a bank, we have a long history of using art to complement our brands and enrich our customer-facing and working environments, and we hope that the public can enjoy the mural which celebrates our new visual identity and our continued commitment to Scotland.”
Behind the scenes of our mural in Glasgow 🖌️ 🎨 #TodayIsForTheTaking #TomorrowBeginsToday pic.twitter.com/8oBc5L8kQF
— Royal Bank (@RBS_Help) May 11, 2023
Described as a “creative take on outdoor advertising”, most mural advertising involves large-scale eye-catching paintings that are manually applied to city walls by street artists who are hired to design and hand paint the mural onto a building –such as was the case with the Clarks mural in Dennistoun, which was the work of London-based artist Josephine Hicks.
Big brands often favour murals to advertise their products as there are very few rules and regulations when it comes to where and when the adverts can be placed.
In respect of the Clarks and RBS murals, it is understood that both the artworks were done without permission from Glasgow City Council.
In the wake of the Clarks mural being painted over, a council spokesperson said: “This is not an issue where we’ve had to intervene and it appears the matter has been resolved locally.”
READ MORE: 'It appears we won't be seeing it happen again': Controversial commercial mural painted over
Under council regulations, if a building is not listed or located in a conservation area, planning permission would not normally be required for a commercial mural.
However, advertising consent would normally be required from the council to display a mural for that purpose, regardless of the location.
The Herald understands that, to avoid seeking advertising consent and/or planning permission from Glasgow City Council, businesses are commissioning temporary commercial murals with a lifespan of less than four weeks to effectively “exploit” the “28 day rule” for using land or buildings for an “alternative use” contained within planning regulations for the temporary use of land in The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Scotland) Order.
The provision is often used by event organisers for events such as local fairs and effectively allows for a site be used without formal planning permission.
Glasgow MSP Paul Sweeney has called for an end to the practice of “giving carte blanche to commercial entities to use Glasgow buildings for whatever they see fit”.
He said: “Murals have the potential to massively enhance the city’s aesthetic while paying homage to Glasgow’s unique heritage and significant cultural, social or technological achievements.
“To see the gable end of buildings adorned with gargantuan commercial designs through the exploitation of a loophole in planning laws isn’t right and must be prevented in the future.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel