HAS the pub industry survived the worst of the cost-of-doing-business storm?
Reading the trading updates from Marston’s and JD Wetherspoon in recent days, it is almost tempting to think that.
Midlands-based Marston’s was in upbeat mood today, highlighting the enduring popularity of the “Great British pub” and declaring that the outlook for costs and consumer confidence was “steadily improving”. That came as it unveiled an encouraging set of interim results, which underlined the boost to trade from Easter and two May bank holiday weekends.
READ MORE: Hospitality giant Marston's declares outlook 'steadily improving'
The Marston’s results followed a similarly positive update from Wetherspoon, which said last week that profits would come in at the upper end of expectations.
Neither Marston’s nor Wetherspoon are suggesting the cost pressures that have blighted the industry have disappeared. Wetherspoon, in particular, warned that while sales momentum had picked up in the last quarter, inflation “remains a more intractable issue”, especially with regard to labour, energy, and food costs.
There is a sense, though, that the bigger players in the pub world are beginning to see an end to the cost-of-doing business, and we will perhaps see more evidence of that when Mitchells & Butlers unveils its half-year results tomorrow (May 17).
READ MORE: Renfrewshire: Bowfield Hotel & Spa reveals countryside lodges
But while the giants of the pub sector have the financial firepower to withstand the cost inflation that has significantly eroded margins during the last year and more, the pressure on independents has been a good deal more acute. Smaller, independently owned pubs, hotels and restaurants do not possess the buying power or economies of scale that Marston’s or Wetherspoon enjoy, and it is equally unlikely they will have been able afford to hedge their gas and electricity bills.
For venues of this ilk, any talk of an end to the cost-of-doing business crisis would appear to be premature at best.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here