IT was another day of controversy on the energy front today as the latest results from one of the industry’s biggest players sparked fresh criticism from the political world and the trade union movement, as well as an interesting response by the stock market.
BP found itself in the spotlight once again after reporting first-quarter profits of nearly $5 billion, ahead of market forecasts, leading to a claim from Unite that it is “profiteering” amid the ongoing inflation crisis.
And there was a further attack from Labour on the effectiveness (or otherwise) of the UK’s Government’s windfall tax, introduced last year to curb the extraordinary profits oil and gas companies were making after prices spiked following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
🗣️ Time is running out to save on a full year of digital access with our lowest EVER offer starting from £24.
Been meaning to subscribe? Don't wait, this offer is only available for a limited time.
👉 Click here to subscribe
Given UK households continue to endure the misery of sky-high energy bills, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the criticism is understandable – even though BP generates the bulk of its profits outside the UK.
For while thousands of people are struggling to pay their bills, BP is returning billions of dollars of surplus cash to investors. Somewhat bizarrely, shares in the company fell sharply today amid a suggestion from one analyst that it was because the market expected the returns to shareholders to be even higher.
But the outlook for dividends and buybacks would not appear to be the only thing muddying the waters for BP. Another analyst raised the prospect of BP’s current run of bumper profits coming to an end, citing uncertainty in the global economy and the recent banking crisis which could see energy prices in wholesale markets continue to fall.
While this may cause concern to investors with an eye on the long term, it will do nothing to soothe the worries of households who are facing severe financial pressure in the here and now, and who have yet to see any benefit from the fall in wholesale gas prices observed in recent months.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel