A new report has found that Scottish salmon farms are failing to get a grip on sea lice infestations and not managing to meet their own guidelines on lice numbers. It estimates that one single large farm alone in one week potentially emitted two billion sea lice into the water.
The report, Breaching the Limits, from campaigning charity WildFish found that in 2022 lice were reaching levels well above recommendations, with 5 million lice on a single farm at one time. Such levels, it said, revealed “inadequacy of government sea lice regulations”.
These parasites are of concern not just due to their impact on farmed fish welfare but because there is a risk they may then infect wild salmon, which are in serious decline.
Since March 2021, active marine net salmonid farms have been legally required to report weekly average female sea lice levels. Breaching the Limits analysed such industry-reported sea lice data, Fish Health Inspectorate records, and reported chemicals usage.
It revealed that last year the Scottish industry breached its own guidelines, or failed to supply a lice count, for 40% of its counts.
It also pointed out the lack of industry compliance with its own code of good practice sea lice threshold guidance, “despite these being five times more lenient than thresholds considered best practice in neighbouring Norway”.
Marine Scotland has a maximum level of six lice per fish before enforcement is triggered, and two per fish before surveillance is increased, but Norway has thresholds ranging between 0.1-0.2 and 0.5 in the most sensitive period for wild salmon impact.
Rachel Mulrenan, Scotland Director for WildFish, said: “This analysis of industry sea lice data from last year is yet another demonstration of why the Scottish Government needs to take urgent and strong action to tackle sea lice infestations on salmon and trout farms in our coastal waters.”
READ MORE: Will we ever now catch a salmon like Georgina's 64lber?
Particularly concerning, the report said, were lice levels during what is described as “the sensitive period”, the period of young salmon migration, when wild salmon are most vulnerable to sea lice due to their small size, which were reported at levels that exceeded the industry limit guidance on 1 in 4 occasions.
More than two-thirds (130 of the 192) marine open-net salmon farms breached CoGP sea lice limits on at least one occasion.
The Norwegian company Mowi, the report said, recorded sea “lice levels as high as 8.2 lice per fish on one of its farms; 16 times the industry limit, and 40-80 times higher than what would be permitted in the company’s home country of Norway”.
A Mowi spokesperson said: “Mowi takes its obligation to effectively manage sea lice levels on its salmon farms very seriously. Our teams of fish health experts and veterinarians regularly monitor sea lice on our salmon and will quickly intervene to reduce levels if required. For many years now, our sea lice monitoring data and successful management results are posted monthly online for the public to see.”
Wildfish’s figure of 2 billion fish from one farm is calculated based on a single farm which reported an average adult sea lice per fish of 8.2 in week 12 of 2022, and held, according to the report’s calculation, 602,692 salmon – and used egg production and hatching success data.
Moreover, it showed that there was a data gap resulting from a high instance of “no counts” in which numbers were not reported.
Graph from the Wildfish Breaching the Limits report
Loch Duart was the worst-performing producer overall in relation to sea lice numbers. The report said: "Over a third of sea lice counts provided by the company in 2022 were above the industry thresholds; and one of its farms breached Marine Scotland’s 2.0 sea lice limit a total of 19 times – far more than any other producer."
A spokesperson for Loch Duart said: “Wildfish’s latest attempt to discredit our business by cherry-picking data misleads. At Loch Duart, we are committed to doing things differently when faced with the environmental and fish health challenges created by rising water temperatures. We choose to deploy natural treatments over chemical or mechanical ones, such as our pioneering use of cleaner fish and freshwater treatments, simply because we believe it’s the right thing to do for our fish and the environment.”
“Farming this way means that there are times of the year when sea lice levels will naturally elevate, but by allowing our cleaner fish programme time to work it has been repeatedly shown they will bring sea lice down to low levels. Loch Duart is the only salmon farm that invites a local fisheries trust on-site to independently audit its fish health data, going over and above the industry standard on sea lice reporting.”
Loch Duart also reported that the average weekly sea lice levels across all their farms in 2022 was 0.85.
READ MORE: Inquiry into salmon farming demanded after "sickening" levels of fish deaths
READ MORE: A Scottish salmon farm visit. Haunted by mortalities and jellyfish
Dr Matt Palmer, Farmed Salmon Campaign Manager at WildFish, said: “These parasites cause significant health, animal welfare and mortality issues both on the farms and in our wild salmon and sea trout. Poorly controlled, not only do they expose the farmed fish to distress, pain, injury and disease, but they multiply in their billions. Simply swimming past these farms could then prove fatal to our wild fish.”
Ms Mulrenan added: “The Scottish salmon farming industry lauds its Code of Good Practice as ‘world class’; a supposed indication that Scottish salmon and trout farms have their sea lice numbers under control. However, our analysis shows that this is misleading on a number of levels – not only is the industry failing to comply with the Code for up for 40% of the time, with no repercussions; the Code itself is far too lenient as to be effective, and the counts are unverified."
Graph from the Breaching the Limits report showing increase in use of the lice treatment emamectin benzoate between 2021 and 2022
Responding to the report, Tavish Scott, chief executive of Salmon Scotland, said: “Sea lice are naturally occurring and affect both wild and farmed fish populations. Scotland’s salmon farms consistently demonstrate low average levels of lice, thanks to farmers, vets and fish health specialists, with fish health and welfare our farmers’ top priority.”
The Breaching the Limits report recommended that the Scottish Government should close open-net salmon and trout farms and “encourage alternative aquaculture practices that are less environmentally damaging” and that Scottish Government should “immediately introduce absolute limits on sea lice numbers on fish farms, in line with the best available science and the precautionary principle”.
The Scottish Government, Wildfish said, should not rely on industry self-regulation - rather SEPA should “close reporting loopholes and independently verify industry-supplied sea lice data”.
A Scottish Government spokesperson responded: “The Scottish Government takes the issue of our declining salmon stocks very seriously and is committed to working with our partners, both domestic and international, to safeguard this iconic species.
“We value the role of aquaculture in producing world-renowned healthy and quality seafood, through sustainable food production, however we recognise that its delivery and development must be sustainable and with appropriate regulatory frameworks whilst maintaining high environmental standards.
“We remain committed to ensuring the regulation of the interactions of sea lice and SEPA is preparing for a further phase of consultation on a sea lice risk assessment framework this spring. We are also exploring how to strengthen the escapes regulatory regime, including the introduction of penalties where fish farm escapes occur.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel