Students at a Scots university which apologised for “distressing sexism” have said they would be more likely to report sexual assaults to the unions because “they did not believe the institution would deal with their complaints”.
A report commissioned by the University of Glasgow to examine its approach to gendered violence found there had been a significant increase in reports by undergraduates in the past 18 months, post-Covid.
Morag Ross, KC, who led the review, said her inquiry had highlighted “serious problems” within QMU (Queen Margaret Union) and GUSA (Glasgow University Students Association) in its processes to handle incidents.
She added: “Of serious concern is the possibility that students are worried that they cannot rely on the university’s conduct processes or that they will take too long.
“The university procedure, I am told, is seen by some as too remote and too disconnected from student life.”
READ MORE: Senior academic quits over 'flourishing culture of misogyny' at Scots university
She said responsibility for handling complaints within the unions lay, in most cases, with a student elected to office, when they should be handled by senior, trained staff.
She said there had been cases where mistakes had been made with sexual misconduct allegations and “some of those mistakes have been serious”.
The review also looked at workplace sex discrimination, bullying and harassment and interviewed staff affected by an inquiry involving the head of undergraduate medicine, Professor John Paul Leach.
The Herald revealed in September that the university had launched an inquiry into his conduct after a grievance alleging misogynistic behaviour by staff was upheld.
The university admitted it had identified “sexist and discriminatory” incidents that “fell short of professional expectations”.
It led to another senior academic, Dr James Going, quitting his post after 35 years claiming “a culture of misogyny is flourishing” within the school.
The university later announced that Prof Leach was leaving to take up a new post in clinical research.
READ MORE: Senior academic at centre of gendered bullying probe to leave university
Ms Ross said she had spoken to “several members of staff” who had raised concerns. She said confidence in the processes to deal with complaints was “low” but said she was satisfied that the university had taken appropriate action.
The report found there were almost 180 reports by students about gender-based violence between December 2020 and May 2022.
Of those, 42 were about sexual harassment and 57 referenced sexual violence.The student advice centre dealt with a further 52 reports between May 2019 and May 2022.
There are currently three live cases and seven marked “pending” where police are involved.
Ms Ross said the unions were dealing with a significant increase in complaints about sexual misconduct. She said some students arrived at the university “with a strong sense of entitlement and a weaker sense of the value of good behaviour”.
READ MORE: University of Glasgow leaders sorry for 'distressing sexism'
She said “numerous students and former students” had contacted her to complain about the handling of complaints by the university’s unions.
She was critical that there were no accurate statistics showing the number of incidents.
She added: “Worryingly, I was also told that in some cases students might raise their complaints with one of the unions rather than with the University because they did not believe that the University would deal with their concerns, or that it would take too long or be too difficult.
"This was a common theme and it is a matter of serious concern.”
The report acknowledges that there was a genuine commitment by the university to tackle gender-based violence.
A number of approaches were praised including the Safe Zone app, a free online facility that allows students and staff to make contact with University Security and receive immediate help and support.
The University said it was “fully committed” to implementing the report’s recommendations.
An action plan has been drawn up which stipulates that sexual misconduct complaints made to the unions must be escalated to the university.
The university said: “We acknowledge that there are a number of areas where the University can and should improve our practices with regards to reporting and support.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel