Brought to you by
ACUMEN FINANCIAL PLANNING
As global leaders gathered in Scotland for COP26 last year, it became increasingly clear that a majority of investors around the world now reject the idea that companies are responsible only for creating value for shareholders.
Most believe it’s their responsibility to hold companies accountable for their impact on society – including climate change and inequality.
Trillions of pounds have shifted into Environmental, Social and Governance-linked financial products and services and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) points out that ESG aims are immensely important, with net retail sales of UK responsible investment funds reaching almost £12 billion in 2020 – though it adds there are risks if the financial sector responds to rising consumer awareness of ESG issues without a supportive regulatory foundation and adequate guard-rails.
These are familiar issues to Acumen Financial Planning, founded in Aberdeen in 2002 as one of the first firms to provide financial planning as a stand-alone professional service in the north-east of Scotland and which now has offices in Edinburgh, Elgin, Glasgow and Peterhead.
Safety first
Managing director Sandy Robertson believes that the essence of financial planning is carefully guiding his clients from A to B with complete financial safety, developing a professional relationship them that lasts for many years.
He’s seen numerous trends in the sector: “ESG wasn’t a familiar term when Acumen was founded but our investment committee started to look at it seriously a few years ago: on the supply side we thought we should be offering an ESG option and on the demand side there was growing interest from clients.”
He does though have reservations about grouping the terms Environmental, Social and Governance under one umbrella label.
“The environmental aspect – ensuring that the planet survives – is something that the whole world can address, regardless of culture or government. Whereas the social element will vary from country to country, as will the governance factor,” he says.
Acumen sees most of its clients annually to reappraise their aims and ambitions, and while ESG is featuring increasingly in these discussions, it has not been a sudden phenomenon.
“While there is a significant minority now seeking to engage in ESG and have their portfolios tilted in that direction, the majority still don’t – not because they don’t care but because they don’t think that is necessarily an effective approach for them.”
Different objectives
ESG then, depends on the individual and their financial goals. Robertson says that for the firm’s more mature segment, non-ESG is currently the default route, with ESG being introduced when it is needed – while he acknowledges that there is a demographic demarcation, ESG is the default as the initial discussion point for younger accumulators.
The fund management industry, he points out, is always keen to make extra sales. “They are either proactively setting up ESG options or defensively playing catch up, introducing those options.”
While there are complications surrounding shares that already exist in the secondary market (for instance in the fossil fuel sector) he concedes that ESG is, although more gradually than some would lead us to believe, the inexorable direction of travel.
“Ultimately, perhaps in a decade’s time, becoming a listed company will involve the obligation to demonstrate that your governance in these matters meets the required standards. The world, though, is a big place – different countries have different norms and some stock exchanges may be less demanding than we might like.
“Governments worldwide must set standards and objectives regarding ESG and the environment and fund those,” he says, adding: “It’s not something that can be left to the investor: it’s up to governments to take the lead.”
Major events require new thinking
Recently, adds Robertson, imperatives have changed, dramatically highlighted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. “There will be the need to rebuild a country with all the infrastructure that entails – and in Europe the need to rebuild the security of energy supply.
“These are things we weren’t thinking about 12 months ago when the primary concern was – rightly – climate change. But as our eyes open to other dangers, we will continually need to find new solutions because the situation is never static.”
To achieve the aims of ESG, he adds, requires massive investment in the transition from traditional energy sources to wind, solar, wave and tidal power. “And it’s not a given that if you invest wholly in ESG funds that you’ll be able to retire five years earlier; you might have to accept that it’s five years later.
“Many people are happy to do so because they are doing their part by investing in long-term capital projects and while governments are right to make commitments it’s easy to talk about outputs and the targets we’re aiming for we need to work back to the inputs – the things that individual countries, states, cities and people must do to move the needle on that output meter.”
Look to the long term
While Acumen says that analysts suggest full diversification is probably still going to outperform the ESG portfolio of companies by around 1 to 2% a year, if more companies join the ESG ranks, which is highly likely, the decision to invest in them will become an easier one, though not insulated from threatening global events such as those we have recently seen.
Robertson returns to his conviction that investing is a long-term discipline, whether in ESG funds or not. “You are investing in capital markets and that usually works – though not always in a straight line.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here