LAND value increases in Scotland could lead to concentrated landownership, limit community access and exclude new farmers, a new report has warned.
The research by Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) has identified associated risks that need to be managed with natural capital and afforestation driving market interest and land values.
Among the risks identified by the project is that without buyer checks, it is possible for highly polluting industries to reach net zero via offsetting rather than reducing their emissions at source, undermining the integrity of both markets and global political agreements.
Farmland values across the UK rose by 6.2 per cent in 2021, with Scotland experiencing the strongest growth in values of just over 31 per cent overall and 60.8 per cent for poor livestock land.
More than 40 per cent of farmland was bought by investors and amenity buyers over the past five years. Natural capital buyers are also increasingly important in the estates market, with £112 million invested in Scottish estates in 2020 – an increase of 55 per cent on the ten-year annual investment.
In addition, increased demand from institutional investors and financial institutions led to average sale prices for commercial forestry land exceeding valuations by around 50 per cent in 2021.
The research was funded as part of a SEFARI Special Advisory Group in collaboration with the Scottish Land Commission.
The report, co-authored by Professor Mark Reed - co-director of SRUC’s Thriving Natural Capital Challenge Centre, outlines the risks these trends could create for markets, land managers and rural communities.
Following an evidence review and a roundtable event with more than 60 experts from policy, investment, third sector, research, land management and rural communities, the report also proposes 16 options for policy and practice.
It also found that while land value increases provide benefits for existing owners, it could exclude new entrants to farming, re-concentrate landownership and limit access to land by rural communities.
The options for reducing the risks and enhancing the positive impacts of natural capital investment include developing guidance on the rights and responsibilities for investors entering the UK market, supporting alternative landowner models such as community ownership and addressing barriers to tenants engaging in ecosystem markets.
Mr Reed said: “Interest in natural capital and ecosystem markets is driving rapid and significant change in the land use sector across the UK, but these changes are layered on top of - and often symptomatic of - long term and systemic issues in land markets, such as concentration of landownership, and other market drivers, such as timber prices.
“It is important that effective and well-aligned market-based and public-support mechanisms are designed to tackle existing structural barriers, avoid policy conflicts and ensure land use transitions are viable across a wide range of land managers and holding types and sizes.”
Scottish retail park for sale for £20m
A SHOPPING centre in West Lothian that is home to a host of big-name retailers is up for sale with a price tag of nearly £20 million.
Almondvale West Retail Park, which has tenants including Next, TK Maxx, Smyths Toys, Decathlon and Harry Corry, has been brought to the market at a guide price in excess of £19.125m.
Newspaper, magazine wholesaler set for £4.5m McColl's administration hit
SMITHS News has said it expects its bad debt risk from the administration of McColl's to be between £3.4 million to £4.5m.
The calculation is a reduction on the earlier estimate of £5.6m, which it “took steps to mitigate".
Sign up: You can now get the briefing sent direct to your email inbox twice-daily, and Business Week for the weekly round-up on Sunday 👇
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel