If there has been one message businesses have given at Glasgow’s City Centre Task Force, it was the need to get back to the office.
All the data has shown that the city suffered the second worst drop in weekday footfall only exceeded by London itself. Now that the working from home guidance has been lifted after 20 months in place, at varying levels of enforcement, it is not only city centre businesses that will see how quickly weekday footfall will recover but so too will the companies operating our public transport network.
The move has been tempered however with the Scottish Government’s hybrid working guidance. Chamber members would rather the government stopped interfering in the decisions businesses must make to manage their staff. Hybrid working is likely to be widely introduced by the city’s businesses – at least in the early stages of recovery – and the government almost certainly did not need to reinforce their message with formal guidance.
It matters too that students are welcomed back to campus and our colleges and universities are eagerly awaiting guidance to allow that to happen. The damage done to their learning experience and mental health is even more important but there is no question their return would also help city centre business recovery.
Nevertheless, we can now begin to see in practice what the changes in commuting behaviours are going to be.
One announcement from the Scottish Government should be warmly welcomed. Cabinet Secretary Michael Matheson gave the Glasgow Metro top billing as he revealed the projects to be supported over the next twenty years in the latest Scottish Transport Projects Review.
This is a clear achievement for City Council Leader Susan Aitken whose 2019 Connectivity Commission report was specifically referenced by the Cabinet Secretary. She has worked persistently since the Commission report launch to persuade the Scottish Government of the Metro’s merits. With both national and local levels of government now endorsing a Glasgow Metro system, we have the opportunity to accelerate investment in Glasgow’s regional public transport network. Without this investment it is extremely hard to see how the Scottish Government’s goal to cut car use by 20% by 2030 could ever be achieved without seriously antagonizing both current and aspiring car owners.
It should come as no surprise that Glasgow Chamber of Commerce vigorously supports the Scottish Government’s decision. We have long argued for a rail connection between Glasgow Airport and the city centre, while the Connectivity Commission report concluded that there should be a rail link between Paisley Gilmour Street station and Glasgow Airport using the currently identified City Deal funding by 2025. The report also concluded this should be the first leg of the Glasgow Metro extension, serving what it described as the South Clyde Growth Corridor connecting the Airport, the emerging Advanced Manufacturing Innovation District, Renfrew, the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and the city centre. The Chamber’s governing Council debated and accepted in full the Connectivity Commission report. In making its decision, the Chamber also explicitly supported recommendations to improve the region’s bus system, in addition to the roll out of the city centre Avenues programme, an investment in the attractiveness of the centre for pedestrians and cyclists. It also supported the creation of a City Region Development Agency to help attract private sector funding to cover the investment costs involved in creating the comprehensive, modern rapid transit system the Glasgow Metro should become. Now the debate on national priorities is coming to a close, the focus must shift to the practical arrangements that will get the government’s recommendations delivered as quickly as possible.
Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel