Shares in Omega Diagnostics fell by nearly a third yesterday as investors took a grim view on the possibility of the Scottish company raising additional funding.
Responding to “recent online speculation” Omega confirmed that it is in discussions with “certain investors and shareholders” regarding a potential equity fundraising. If it goes ahead, it would be executed at a discount to the company’s already battered AIM-listed share price.
“Market conditions remain challenging and accordingly any issue of equity would be at a discount to the current share price,” Omega said. “Any fundraise would include an open offer to accommodate retail investors.”
The statement from the testing kit manufacturer came less than two weeks after it played down speculation of such a move following the departure of Colin King as chief executive. He has been replaced by Jag Grewal, who previously headed up the Alva-headquartered company’s health and nutrition division.
Omega reiterated that as per its last announcement on January 19, it currently has “significant” cash resources and thus there is no “immediate need” to raise additional capital. It might therefore choose not to proceed with a fundraising “until such time as conditions are more favourable”.
READ MORE: ‘No surprise’ as battered Omega share price prompts CEO’s exit
“A further announcement will be made in due course as necessary,” the company added.
Mr King’s departure came after a bruising 10 months in which the Alva-headquartered company has suffered from the unwinding of what could have been a lucrative contract to produce rapid Covid tests for the UK’s Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). From highs of almost 100p in February and March of last year, the stock has now lost more than 90 per cent of its value.
Announcing the appointment of Mr Grewal as chief executive on January 19, Omega noted that it had cash balances of more than £2.5 million and an undrawn overdraft facility of £2m.
“Thus, there is no short-term need to raise additional capital,” it said at that time. “Like all growth companies, Omega will look to raise funds to drive growth as and when appropriate.”
Mr King joined Omega as chief operating officer in August 2015 from his previous post as site director with Axis-Shield. He was appointed chief executive in December 2017.
As such he spearheaded discussions with the government on the DHSC contract and presided over a strategic review in which the company axed its lower-growth allergy division to focus more resources on Covid-19 testing.
READ MORE: Omega shares tumble on expiry of major Government contract
UK officials confirmed in March that Omega had been selected as one of three companies to produce hundreds of millions of tests in a two-part agreement that could have been worth up to £374m to the Scottish firm. However, no decision was ever made on which test the government wanted, and in November it was confirmed that the contract had expired and would not move into the production phase.
Shares in the company, which has a large retail investor base, then lost more than a quarter of their remaining value in December when the government demanded the return of a £2.5m pre-production payment given to Omega to ramp up manufacturing capacity during the initial phase of the contract. The company has said that based on the legal advice it has received, it does not believe it is liable to repay the money.
Mr Grewal has been a member of the board of directors since he joined Omega in June 2011 from his previous post as head of business development at GSTS Pathology. A graduate in biochemistry from Cardiff University and analytical chemistry from Birkbeck at the University of London, he has more than 25 years’ experience in the fields of in vitro diagnostics, life science research and drug discovery.
Shares in Omega closed yesterday’s trading 32% lower, down 3.4p at 7.25p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here