Although it may not yet feel like it, the Covid crisis will soon be over. A combination of weakening effect, vaccine take-up, partial herd immunity and better treatments for those who are ill means the acute phase of the pandemic in the UK is drawing to a close. Think days and weeks not months. Hopefully the politicians will keep up and our full freedoms are rapidly restored.
What will not quickly fade – and some may never fade – are the effects of the pandemic; social caution, changes in patterns of work, where we want to live, the rise of certain industries and the fall of others, the pressure on the NHS, debt.
What must not fade – and in fact should be grasped as an opportunity – are the lessons we can learn and the actions we should take.
A key lesson – which informs all others – is that Covid-19 will not be a one-off. There may be specific differences next time but all of us; citizens, businesses and governments would be unwise to assume that another event which disrupts our lives and economies won’t happen again – our planning should assume that it will. Better planning is key because we were not as ready for Covid -19 as we should have been.
The first specific lesson is a very positive one. If financial resources, government policy and entrepreneurial ingenuity are combined it is amazing what we can do. The vaccines and growing list of treatments for Covid-19 are a near miracle. We must not let research into treatments and vaccines for viruses slip back to their former level, we must build on what has been achieved.
What if we turned at least a decent part of the intellectual and financial firepower we have spent on Covid-19 on to other things? Cancer, Parkinson’s, diabetes; we may not be able to eliminate them but over a 10-year period we could transform the outcomes for those who suffer from them.
The health service. Rather oddly the restrictions we are enduring now are actually less about Covid-19 itself but a need to protect the NHS so we can get treatment if we have a heart attack or stroke.
The NHS needs to have more resilience, more reserve capacity built into it. Not more of the same because that capacity will be used as a matter of routine. Can we make arrangements for the NHS to take over chains of hotels if required and to have a hand in the design of those hotels? Can we create a reserve of personnel, trained with specific skills, who can be mobilised to support the core NHS workforce through the next crisis?
For businesses, planning needs to shift from “what will we do if?” to “what will we do when?”. More diversified and more local sourcing, keeping in touch with those who have recently retired so that they could return, spreading key support centres geographically, upgrading information technology, reviewing capital structures. This sort of thinking needs to advance from something you do perfunctorily and stick in a drawer to being a real part of corporate strategic plans. Investors need to play their part in this by rewarding resilience rather than encouraging apparent capital and asset “efficiency”.
For governments there must be the same focus on planning for “when” not “if” but there needs also to be a dramatic improvement in financial resilience. The UK Government has actually done well, having like most governments initially been caught off guard, in developing policies such as the furlough scheme to protect the economy.
The reason the UK was able to implement these policies is that it had the financial credibility to be able to borrow the money to pay for them. National debt is now around £2.2 trillion. This is too high and the reason it is too high is not that we can’t cope with it – the UK has the muscle to do that – but because we might not have the ability to pay for another crisis without deep and long-lasting economic damage. Credibility is not a linear thing, you have it until you suddenly don’t. We need to get the level of debt down – and quite quickly – so that when the next big challenge hits us we are ready and have the strength to overcome it.
Guy Stenhouse is a Scottish financial sector veteran who wrote formerly as Pinstripe
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here