Fewer than two per cent of appeals against results issued under the 2021 alternative certification process resulted in a grade change, statistics show.
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) figures reveal that, of 519,429 entries, there were 3,483 requests, either on the grounds of academic judgement, unresolved administrative error or discrimination.
It comes after the ongoing impact of Covid-19 led to a decision to axe conventional exams for the second year in a row. Candidate results were instead based on teacher judgement supported by evidence of demonstrated attainment.
READ MORE: Drop in pass rates for Scottish pupils amid Covid disruption
The latest statistics confirm 3,265 entries requested an appeal following disagreement with their school, college or training provider and its academic judgement of learner evidence. In addition, there were 30 appeals on the grounds of an unresolved administrative error and 188 in relation to claims of discrimination.
Figures show that, across the three available grounds, 1.6% of requests (57 of 3,483) resulted in a grade change, with 44 upgrades and 13 downgrades. There are 15 appeals on the grounds of discrimination still under consideration, and which are not included in the latest data.
SQA bosses stressed that, since there were no standardised assessments in 2021, the appeals process required a different approach. Any evidence supplied in support of an appeal was considered closely by appointees – practising teachers and lecturers – who reviewed materials against the broad assessment requirements of the course.
The starting point for the review was that the judgements of schools, colleges, and training providers were fair and within acceptable tolerances. Only if the appointee discerned a significant and material difference was a change in grade recommended.
READ MORE: John Swinney told alternative assessment is 'new parliament's first scandal'
Fiona Robertson, SQA Chief Executive and Scotland’s chief examining officer, said: “This was another very challenging year for the whole Scottish education system, who together with learners, parents and carers, worked hard to ensure the Alternative Certification Model was credible and fair and enabled learners to receive the qualifications they deserved.
“The vast majority of learners did not appeal their grades this year. However, it was important that a free, direct right of appeal was made available to learners as the final essential part of the alternative certification model. This was a major change from previous years and a direct response to the national consultation we conducted.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel