Kate Forbes, Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy, has the opportunity to offer some help to consumer businesses in our beleaguered city centres in her budget announcement in December.
She might have hoped that the Scottish Government’s decision to give full rates relief to the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors for this financial year would have been enough to see them through to recovery but another disrupted winter is on the cards.
In Glasgow, the city centre continues to struggle and COP26 has sadly made the situation worse. Continuing rates relief into the 2022/23 financial year would be at least one welcome move.
The Centre for Cities statistics have now been updated reaching the end of October and on the centre’s mobile phone footfall measure, Glasgow has dropped back to second worst in a list of 63 cities and large towns across the UK. Only London now has a worse performance and the gap with Glasgow is closing.
The very gradual summer recovery had helped Scotland’s largest city centre reach just over 70 per cent of the pre-Covid levels of February 2020 but the warnings of disruption and traffic congestion during COP26 knocked that back to 64% even before the conference began.
Some of the reports from shops, bars and restaurants suggest the position deteriorated a great deal further in what is traditionally known as the Golden Quarter.
It is true that Glasgow’s hotels did better but while COP lifted occupancy rates to 72% for November the current figures for December have collapsed back to 30% and the early months of 2022 are currently just over 10%. Operating a hotel involves very high fixed costs and for some the financial pressure may be too severe to cope with a return to full business rates in April.
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak has already committed next year to a £1.7 billion rates relief measure for English retail, hospitality and leisure business.
That comes in the form of a 50% relief on rates bills up to £110,000 for each business. Ms Forbes might argue that the Chancellor’s rates support in the current year was less generous than her own but as the Centre for Cities data shows, the recovery in English cities has also been on average faster.
That is largely down to the greater emphasis the Scottish Government has placed on working from home as a virus suppression measure. The Centre for Cities includes a weekday index in its data which tells us how much daytime footfall has returned to city centres during the working week. Glasgow’s weekday index at the end of October stood at 54 against February 2020, while comparably large English cities like Birmingham and Leeds were 69 and 74 respectively.
Arguing for a swift end to the Scottish Government’s guidance on home working may appear counterintuitive in the early winter weeks but Scottish Chambers of Commerce Chief Executive Liz Cameron said on Monday that ‘the modelling being put forward by the Scottish Government fails to demonstrate that workplace transmission is taking place in office settings’.
She argued that further government pressure on employers to increase home working “would be a considerable step backwards” especially for our town and city centres.
Much as one might wish it however, the Scottish Government appears unlikely to lift that guidance any time soon.
But the damage being done to Glasgow city centre shows it is not a costless measure and we will continue to argue that it should be kept under very regular review. Failing that, the argument for Ms Forbes to consider a further round of business rates relief gathers even greater importance.
Stuart Patrick is the chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here