THE billionaire owner of Topshop has failed in his legal bid to overturn a local authority’s decision to grant permission to the construction of Scotland’s first spaceport.
Anders Holch Povlsen,48, instructed lawyers to go to the Court of Session in Edinburgh to stop the building of the Sutherland Space hub in the country’s far north.
The businessman believed that Highland Council were wrong to grant planning permission to the vertical launch facility, which supporters believe could boost the local economy.
Lawyers for Mr Povlsen believed the August 2020 decision failed to take into account the risks to the local environment and wildlife populations.
The action was raised by Mr Povlsen’s company - Wildland Limited. Its advocate Malcolm Thomson QC told judge Lord Doherty earlier this year that Highland Council didn’t follow correct legal procedures.
However, in a judgement issued at the court on Friday, Lord Doherty rejected the submissions made to him by Mr Thomson.
He wrote: “I am not persuaded that the respondent has erred in law.
“I am not persuaded that the respondent did not apply the correct test. In my opinion there is nothing in the appropriate assessment which suggests the existence of any such error, and there is nothing in the report of handling which causes me to conclude that the report led the respondent into any such error.”
Mr Povlsen is Scotland's largest private landowner. He owns the clothing empire Bestseller and is believed to have a net worth of more than £6 billion.
Experts say he owns more of the UK than the Queen and the Church of Scotland combined.
A mock-up of the proposed port.
Mr Povlsen is the largest shareholder in online fashion retailer ASOS. In February 2021, the company bought Sir Philip Green’s Arcadia retail empire - which included Topshop, Topman and Miss Selfridge – in a deal thought to be worth £330 million.
The businessman objected to the development in Sutherland on environmental grounds and later announced that he had invested more than £1.4 million in a rival spaceport on Shetland.
His company Wildland Limited lodged a petition for judicial review against Highland council's decision to approve the scheme.
The Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) project at A'Mhòine, near Tongue, in Sutherland, is expected to create more than 200 jobs, with satellites being launched from the station.
Highland council received 457 objections and 118 representations in support of HIE's planning application.
The company has concerns over the spaceport's impact on "environmentally vulnerable protected areas".
During proceedings, Mr Thomson told Lord Doherty that evidence showed that the council didn’t properly consider the impact that people visiting the site could have on the local environment.
He said that proposals for visitor facilities and the site’s launch exclusion zone would not do enough to protect wildlife.
Mr Thomson said the proposed space site is located close to an “area of environmental protection” but the council hasn’t properly considered how to mitigate the damage that visitors could cause to the area.
Lawyers for Highland Council told the court that the local authority had properly considered the impact that the port would have on the environment.
Lord Doherty agreed with the submissions made by the council and concluded that it had followed proper legal tests.
He said that none of the grounds of the challenge were “well founded.”
He added: :“Development of the visitor facilities will require a further application for planning permission. At that stage the cumulative environmental impact of SHS and the visitor facilities will require to be assessed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel