Do we trust politicians to keep their promises and deliver on what they know must be done? Can we change when the need and evidence is overwhelming? The answer from the past points to “no”, unless there is a crisis. We have one now in health and wellbeing, and in significant economic and social damage.
Before we start the Covid recovery in earnest, let’s remind ourselves of what not to do. We should avoid repeating the cycle of reviews, commissions and the inevitable point-scoring on who is to blame. The past cannot be changed. Even when we find out what needs to be done, it does not mean anything will be. We can do better than this.
We have just passed a 10-year anniversary of the Christie Commission and the universal acceptance of what was required for public service reform. All against the backdrop of rising demand and budget cuts. Sounds familiar. Christie recommended that focus and budgets should be invested in prevention, empowering communities and stopping families being pulled into multiple complex services to the cost of their wellbeing, as well as taxpayers. Everyone agreed, but the reality is little has been done. Delivering meaningful results inevitably takes time, patience and positive persuasion. A dedication to lasting change is vulnerable to the media fixation with new initiatives. Social media impacts not just young people’s attention spans but corporates and governments too.
However, we now have a fantastic opportunity to deliver for our young people who suffer the greatest disadvantages through absolutely no fault of their own. It makes complete sense both socially and economically. These are two sides of the same coin.
Scotland had a Care System Review and, like Christie, this made many insightful and critical recommendations. Uniquely, it then set out a change process, “The Promise”, on how to deliver the recommendations. There is a now a process to bridge any chasm between a plan or aspiration and the reality. I’ve worked in corporate transformations throughout the world and know there must be three critical parts to any change. Firstly, the plan and aspiration but then the reality check in detail of where we are and importantly the collective steps that must be taken by all parties. The human dynamic and fuel for progress is found in three words in a collective “motivation” to right the wrong but then the “commitment” to put the time in and “resilience” to keep at it when all goes wrong, and the politics takes over.
Individuals make change happen, not systems. Systems need consistency and resist change by default. They build dense infrastructure which entrenches the status quo. The Promise sets out how we can individually, collectively, and institutionally ensure young people in or on the edges of the care system grow up feeling loved, safe and respected. Just what we want for our own children. They haven’t done anything wrong and believe me have the same potential and talent.
As founder of MCR Pathways I can share thousands of inspiring stories of young people who were once destined to a lifetime suppressed or traumatised by their circumstances but are now realising their potential. The failings were despite the best endeavours of those working in the care system. It is the system that needs to change. Take another example with Glasgow Life and The Herald’s campaign to reform the way it is funded. Across 171 locations, the charity provides critical services to all of Glasgow’s communities in its libraries, museums, galleries, concert halls, community centres and sports facilities. All deemed essential to the social and economic health and wellbeing of the city. The demand is increasing whilst the system cuts the budgets.
So, for any change, it’s about each of us making it happen in our own way. A personal choice, not rhetoric and debating arenas for grandstanding politics. Taking care of those that need our help and support is priority.
What has this got to with business? Simple. An engaged workforce is research-proven to drive a 22% increase in profitability, 21% increase in productivity and 41% increase in quality, as well as a 37% reduction in absenteeism. Profoundly, 87% of employees who volunteer feel engaged, have greater pride in their company, have increased job satisfaction and are developing new skills.
It is time to set an example of what is possible and deliver on The Promise. Positively change the situation where we spend £1.2 billion to deliver a care system, then spend £1.6bn to compensate for its failings. There are tough decisions ahead involving taking money away from some existing services and accepting short-term that will be unpopular. It just requires the truth and for people to be given the time, support and motivation to adjust. However, for those working in business this a process that happens more naturally. Business knows if something doesn’t work, customers will vote with their feet.
Take time to understand The Promise and imagine what keeping it means for Scotland. For our young people in the care system they just need us to care, to listen and treat them as we do our own children. There is nothing complicated about that. Volunteer and mentor is a powerful place to start.
Iain MacRitchie is an entrepreneur, founder and Chair of MCR Pathways and a visiting professor at the University of Strathclyde. He is also an Oversight Board member of The Promise tasked with holding Scotland to account for the delivery of The Care Review
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here