It's understandable that many people have questions about the policing of the events at the weekend.
However, whether it’s the anonymous empowerment of Twitter or because of the insatiable appetite for their nonsense crime dramas, nobody seems to know policing better than the cadre of ‘Armchair Commanders’ who chose to assert their views on social media at the weekend.
Forget the centuries of experience and knowledge in the Police Command Suites, in the Control rooms and on the streets. “I once watched Shetland so I know how to police” was pretty the summary of their posts.
Policing is a complex business. When society entrusts officers with powers to deprive people of their liberty, to prevent citizens from going places or to enact the law, a complex assessment of risks and outcomes have to be considered. Whether this is a response police officer deciding whether to arrest somebody, a detective assessing the vulnerability of a victim, or a traffic cop deciding whether to pursue a stolen vehicle, we are accountable for our all actions, and all our inactions.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon condemns 'disgraceful'’ scenes as Rangers fans flout Covid restrictions
In recognition of the responsibility that comes with statutory powers, our new recruits begin their training with human rights training and the National Decision Making Model - a tool that assists officers to continuously review, consider and act on what can be lifechanging situations for people.
Specialist policing, firearms and public order are however the most sensitive variables in this equation, where the risks of getting it wrong can be catastrophic. It requires the police to consider the strategic outcomes, to adapt, to be agile in escalation- and more importantly de-escalation.
On Sunday night, social media erupted in rightful fury at the selfish behaviour of thousands of Rangers fans as they wilfully ignored Covid laws to celebrate their team's victory. But as short-clips of their behaviour began to appear on the internet the finger of blame was suddenly pointed at the police for their apparent “inaction”. But when challenged to suggest an alternative policing approach, that’s where the Armchair Commanders came into their own.
“Water cannon them”. “Water cannon them with disinfectant”. “Let them into the stadium and keep them there until they give their names to track and trace”. “Arrest them all”. “Put up roadblocks to keep them out the city”. “Arrest known protagonists from their houses”.
In amongst all the madness in Glasgow we can be comforted by all the experts telling the police how it should be done
— Calum Steele (@CalumA_Steele) March 7, 2021
And there was I thinking we lived in Scotland not North Korea.
What nobody seemed to grasp though was the bigger picture. Police officers were vastly outnumbered. This was primarily a Public Order incident and once started, it was about trying to nudge it intelligently, judging the mood and taking the least worst option. A successful public order operation should be an anti-climax.
READ MORE: John Swinney: 'Silence from Rangers deafening' over fans' title celebrations
Calls to give everyone (men, women and children) tickets were as impractical as arresting them all and tough enforcement always “up’s the ante”. Whilst the mood was generally jovial, police officers were still assaulted, and I know there were concerns that the situation could escalate.
Another source of criticism was the escort of hundreds of fans into the city centre. The commanders would likely have been faced with a choice of fans swarming along many different roads to the city centre, or putting in place a controlled safe escort for the safety of fans and other road users. Surely that’s not a hard choice?
Thousands of people broke the law at the weekend, including all those fans in Glasgow. It was disgraceful, selfish and dangerous but the zero-tolerance approach demanded by so many ‘Armchair Commanders’ would have led to more violence, many more injuries and would have destroyed the legitimacy of that kernel of law enforcement, “policing by consent”. Yes, even on TV’s ‘Shetland’.
David Hamilton is the chair of the Scottish Police Federation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel