By Scott Wright
PUB trade campaigners have accused Tory MSPs of trying to "wreck" legislation which would give tenants greater rights in their dealings with powerful landlords.
The Tied Pubs (Scotland) Bill, proposed by Labour MSP Neil Bibby, will be debated by MSPs on the Economy, Energy, and Fair Work Committee at Holyrood this week. The Bill proposes to introduce a statutory code of conduct to govern the relationship between tenants and landlords, and “market-rent-only” lease deals, allowing tenants to pay the market rate to rent pubs without having to buy beer from landlords. The latter would end the beer tie.
However, a coalition of trade groups which supports the bill say there has been an attempt to derail the legislation after 315 amendments were introduced before the stage 2 debate. Some 50 pages of amendments have been lodged by a handful of MSPs to a bill that was originally 21 pages long. More than 220 of the 285 amendments were tabled by Conservative MSPs.
The bill is supported by the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, CAMRA (Campaign for Real Ale), the British Pub Confederation and what is understood to be the majority of Scottish pub tenants in Scotland.
Paul Waterson of the SLTA said the Tories had put "wrecking amendments" in place. “It’s simply not fair that large pub-owning businesses can restrict pub tenants to buying beer at vastly inflated prices and force so many to live in virtual poverty,” he said.
“The SLTA has listened carefully to the arguments on both sides... and has offered to work with the pub companies on a series of compromises that could be proposed via joint amendments, which would both address their concerns and also allow pub tenants a fair deal and the ability to earn a decent living. It is disappointing that the bill’s opponents have chosen to try to subvert the legislation with these amendments rather than engaging in positive and constructive dialogue to find a genuine, fair and equitable compromise, but our door is always open.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel