HOUSEBUILDING giant Persimmon has set aside £75 million to pay for work on potentially unsafe cladding on 26 multi-storey buildings constructed by the group.
The Charles Church owner said it had identified nine high-rise buildings over 18 metres built by the group where cladding may need to be removed, although it no longer owns the sites.
There are also a further 17 buildings less than 18 metres tall that may be fitted with unsafe cladding and need investigating.
Persimmon said it would book the charge in its 2020 results to cover its contribution for work on the buildings, with its full-year figures set to be announced in March.
It came as the UK Government announced funding on Wednesday to help tackle the cladding crisis more than three-and-a-half years after the Grenfell Tower fire, which killed 72 people.
Persimmon said it believes it accounts for less than one per cent of all high-rise developments.
READ MORE: Housebuilder hails hundreds of new homes in Scotland amid strong demand
"However, in the past we have built multi-storey buildings which met all the fire safety rules and regulations in place at the time, but which used cladding materials which may now be considered unsafe and require removal," said.
Roger Devlin, chairman of Persimmon, said: "At Persimmon, we believe we have a clear duty to act to address this issue. Where we still own the building, we will act. Where we no longer own them, we will work with the owners to make sure they meet their legal responsibilities and duty. If the owner does not step up then we will act to remove uncertainty and anxiety for residents and make the buildings safe."
Asked about details of any Scottish sites, the firm said it is not announcing the locations as “it would be inappropriate to be specific in public before they have been contacted”.
Persimmon said it was in the process of writing to building owners and management companies to inform them of the findings of its review and to agree next steps. It said it wanted to "progress matters as swiftly as possible, minimising uncertainty and concern for residents".
Shares closed at 2,704p, down almost 3%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel