By Scott Wright
INVESTORS in Cairn Energy were toasting an early Christmas gift last night after the company was awarded $1.4 billion with victory in its long-running tax dispute with India, sending its share price soaring more than 20 per cent and opening the door to potential hefty pay-outs for shareholders.
It was the second major boost for shareholders in the Edinburgh-based oil and gas giant in less than a week, with investors also set to share a pay-out of around $250 million following the sale of its Senegal operation to Australia’s Woodside
for $400m.
Cairn has been awarded damages of $1.2 billion (£890 million), plus interest and costs understood to amount to around $200 million, following the conclusion of a battle with the Indian government that stretches back to 2014.
That was when Cairn was hit with a $1.6bn tax claim by the then India government, relating to events leading up to an initial public offering of shares in the company’s former subsidiary in India in 2006.
The Indian administration of the time froze Cairn’s shareholding in the subsidiary, which by then had been whittled down to a 10 per cent stake, and pursued its claim under new retrospective taxation laws.
Cairn maintained throughout that it had paid all taxes due in India, and submitted a claim for more than $1.4bn in compensation from the country’s government.
Yesterday, Cairn announced the international tribunal in the Netherlands, which was established in 2018 to rule on its claim under the terms of the UK-India Bilateral Investment Treaty, had settled in
its favour.
The tribunal, which held proceedings under the registry of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, ruled unanimously that India had breached its obligations to Cairn under the UK-India Bilateral Investment Treaty.
The result is materially significant to Cairn, as highlighted by the size of the pay-out relative to the company’s market value of around £1.2bn.
Cairn’s chief executive Simon Thomson has previously said the company could make significant pay-outs to investors if it won
the dispute.
The company may also use the windfall to invest in further investment and exploration opportunities.
With the international tribunal the highest stage at which the case could have been heard, it is understood that the ruling is final and binding, and cannot be challenged further.
Cairn has been in close contact with the British Government, Foreign and Commonwealth Office and High Commission of India throughout the case, and it is thought representations on the issue of payment is on the agenda when Prime Minister Boris Johnson visits India on January 26, as part of India’s national day.
James Thompson, an analyst at JP Morgan Cazenove said in a brokers’ note: “The ruling cannot be challenged. The payment of the award becomes due immediately, though the onus now falls upon India to pay and therefore we look for confirmation from the Government of India that payment will be forthcoming in the near term (we note that UK PM Boris Johnson is due in Delhi on January 26 2021).
“This news is undoubtedly a positive result for Cairn Energy, and while the risk around physical payment will endure, likely until it is paid, we expect shares to respond very positively to the news today.
“As well, we note that the Senegal transaction has completed, with funds received from Woodside, meaning the previously announced dividend is fully covered by cash on the balance sheet.”
Broker Stifel also raised the issue over when Cairn could expect to receive payment, noting that the award was higher than expected.
The analyst said: “Given the size of both this award and the similar ruling in September with the arbitration involving Vodafone India (although that did not involve seizure of assets unlike in the Cairn India case), we would expect India to exhaust every possible remedy before accepting the ruling, making the timing of the
receipt of any award extremely uncertain.”
Last week, Cairn said it would pay a special dividend of 32p per share after completing the sale of its Senegal business.
Shares in Cairn closed up 36.7p, or 22.1%, at 202.6p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel