Carlsberg and Marston's are to be allowed to merge in a £780 million deal, even through it could lead to pubs serving fewer beers from independent brands.
The Competition and Markets Authority said it has cleared the combination of the businesses, after finding that concerns raised over the deal did not warrant blocking the move.
The regulator said Marston's owns many pubs across the UK which might choose to serve more Carlsberg products, and fewer independent brands.
"The CMA found, however, that Marston's pubs form only a small part of the potential UK customer base for brewers, and that independent brewers would continue to have sufficient access to pubs after the merger, allowing them to compete effectively," it said in a statement.
READ MORE: Restaurant staff ‘devastated’ as doors shut on hospitality trade
It drew a similar conclusion about the combined companies' wholesale operations, saying that brewers will have sufficient alternative wholesalers to choose from after the deal.
The companies' breweries are also different enough for there not to be any real concerns, the CMA said. Carlsberg produces mainly lager, while Marston's focuses on ale.
Shore Capital analyst Greg Johnson said the CMA's decision will help Marston's reduce its debt, which was an issue even before the pandemic.
"Although, given the enlarged entity would command around 14% of the UK beer market, we expected the merger to be cleared, it is a positive development, unlocking the £239 million initial cash payment to Marston's," he said.
However, he warned that "the trading backdrop remains challenging" as Covid-19 continues to force restrictions on pubs and other leisure businesses.
Marston's said: "We are pleased to report that the Competition and Markets Authority have cleared the proposed joint venture, and the antitrust condition to completion has now been satisfied.
"The transaction will now complete at the end of October 2020."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article