The best person should get the job? Of course, that is the myth of the recruitment industry that has propagated the monoculture in corporate Britain for decades.
Just over 100 years ago women were granted the vote, by men. For centuries it was believed that only men could be trusted to make important decisions and be responsible for governing.
This myth was perpetuated by men themselves, believing they were more worthy, and in turn women were socialised to believe they were less capable, with their aspirations curtailed to ensure they didn’t get ideas above their station.
We can still see similar examples applied to those who are black or disabled, and also to those who identify as LGBTQ+.
Yet I still hear talent acquisition teams and hiring managers talk about this meritocracy as if it is a rule cast in stone that must be believed at all cost. After all, if it is thought that sometimes the best person does not get the job then it undermines the whole basis of fairness in the recruitment industry.
READ MORE: Time to ‘get the conversation going’ on racial bias at work
Who decides what makes up the rule set to determine the ideal candidate – it is the incumbents, those who already hold the power and privilege in both society and the workplace? Ask yourself: how often is that process open to scrutiny and challenge?
We can look at job descriptions and adverts and see the language is full of bias or phrases that instantly turn off many perfectly able people simply because they are not straight white men.
Only when organisations tackle this myth head-on and stop believing it, will we get progress. Only when we start to value skills beyond time served, the ability to sell your soul and forsake family life, will we be able to look for people who have emotional intelligence, flexibility, tenacity, and who have experiences of living in other ways.
Complacency can often find its foothold in privilege. People will believe their own personal PR, find themselves promoted to the edge of competence and still push themselves forward amongst the PLUs (people like us).
READ MORE: Putting diversity and inclusion at the heart of economic recovery
This leaves those who may speak more softly, those who haven’t had the same opportunities in life, or simply those who by the very nature of the communities they grew up in have not had the same access to the top schools or universities, to be on the outside of opportunities.
We are living in a newer world, one that has had a wake up call. Inclusion, diversity, wellbeing and mental health are at the top of most corporate agendas. Now is the time to reject the idea that hiring on meritocracy is working and do something different.
Joanne Lockwood is an inclusion and belonging specialist with SEE Change Happen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel